Associating Metrics of Hunting Effort with Hunting Rate: A Case Study with the Wild Boar Sus scrofa

Author:

Varuzza Paolo1,Lombardini Marco2,Toscano Valerio3,Argenio Felice2,D’Alessio Nicola4,Caputo Vincenzo3,Veneziano Vincenzo1ORCID,Fioretti Alessandro1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, Via Mezzocannone 8, 80134 Napoli, Italy

2. Geographica srl, Via Prato 41, 84039 Teggiano, Italy

3. Regional Reference Center of Urban Veterinary Hygiene (CRIUV), Via Marco Rocco di Torrepadula c/o Presidio Frullone, 80145 Napoli, Italy

4. Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Via Salute 2, 80055 Portici, Italy

Abstract

Wild boar Sus scrofa populations have increased dramatically in recent decades throughout Europe. While hunting is widely used in management activities; it rarely has an important role in regulating and reducing wild boar populations. Therefore, increasing the efficiency of hunting is a compelling issue. In this study, we used a three-year dataset (2016–2018) on a wild boar population living in Campania (southern Italy) as a case study to explore how the hunting effort made in collective drive hunts affected the hunting rate, estimated as the number of individuals culled per day. We fitted a Linear Mixed Model, in which we included the number of wild boars culled per drive hunt as the dependent variable, and the number of beaters, shooters and dogs and the month during which hunting occurred as the predictors. A mean of 1.81 wild boars were culled per drive hunt. The number of culled animals per hunt increased with the increasing number of hunting dogs and with the progression of the hunting season (i.e., from October to December), whereas the number of beaters and shooters had no effect. Overall, we observed a low hunting rate. We suggest that adjusting the hunting calendar and reorganising wild boar collective hunts, e.g., through an appropriate management of the number and training of hunting dogs, are essential to increase the hunting rate. Our results can be useful for wildlife managers to enhance hunting contribution in counteracting the negative impact of wild boar.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction

Reference66 articles.

1. Too many hogs? A review of methods to mitigate impact by wild boar and feral hogs;Massei;Hum. Wildl. Interact.,2011

2. Wild boar populations up, numbers of hunters down? A review of trends and implications for Europe;Massei;Pest Manag. Sci.,2015

3. Varuzza, P. (2019). Ungulati. Capriolo, Cervo, Daino, Muflone e Cinghiale, Geographica srl.

4. Diet of wild boar Sus scrofa in Western Europe, with particular reference to consumption of agricultural crops;Schley;Mamm. Rev.,2003

5. A review of viral diseases of the European wild boar: Effects of population dynamics and reservoir rôle;Vet. J.,2008

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3