Phenomenology of Quranic Corporeality and Affect: A Concrete Sense of Being Muslim in the World

Author:

Gonzalez Valerie1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Independent Researcher, London SW5 0QF, UK

Abstract

It is a matter to ponder that, among the three Abrahamic monotheisms, Islam places the greatest ontotheological distance between the human and the divine. While God is the ground of being Muslim, Islam excludes theophany and prohibits any tangible association between the divine and anything in the material world. God’s mode of manifesting Himself to His creatures has consisted of the most fleeting and discorporate of all means of communication, namely, sound. His words gathered in the Qur’an thus form a non-solid verbal bridge crossing over that unfathomable distance. One could then think that the relationship between the unique Creator and His creatures relies only on the strength of a blind faith founded on a dry, discursive pact. Arguing his “idea of an anthropology of Islam”, Talal Asad did posit that this religion and its culture form “a discursive tradition”. Exclusively focused on the mental modes of knowledge acquisition, this cognitivist verbalist characterization has become a certitude in Islamic studies at large. Yet, it is only a half-truth, for it overlooks the emphatic involvement, in the definition of this tradition of Islam, of the non-linguistic phenomenality of experience that implicates the pre-logical non-cognitive double agency of affect and sensation in the pursuit of divine knowledge. This article expounds this phenomenology of the Qur’an in using an innovative combination of philosophical and literary conceptualities, and in addressing some hermeneutical problems posed by the established Quranic studies.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Religious studies

Reference50 articles.

1. Abdel Haleem, Muhammad (2001). Understanding the Qur’an, Themes and Styles, IBTauris.

2. Abu Deeb, Kamal (1979). Al Jurjani’s Theory of Poetic Imagery, Aris and Philipps LTD.

3. Ahmed, Shahab (2015). What Is Islam, the Importance of Being Islamic, Harvard University Press.

4. Almond, Ian (2004). Sufism and Deconstruction, A Comparative Study of Derrida and Ibn ʿArabi, Routledge.

5. Altieri, Charles (2003). The Particulars of Rapture: An Aesthetics of the Affects, Cornell University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3