Affiliation:
1. Department of Law, University of Nicosia, Nicosia C-1700, Cyprus
Abstract
It is clearly stated by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) that provided education should not follow or consist of a means of catechism contrary to the religious or philosophical perceptions of the parents. Consequently, a specific negative claim is established: the state, through its educational policy, must refrain from transmitting information that is contrary to the philosophical and religious beliefs of the parents. In Greece, education policy is not neutral. It has a clear Christian orientation, primarily due to the constitutional establishment of the prevailing religion. It is not a constitutional paradox but a choice of the legislator based on cultural and social characteristics. This article aims to present an analysis of the effect of the constitutional establishment of the Christian faith in the national educational policy, which aims at the development of national and religious consciousness. Given that religious education is more freely formulated, the influence of the prevailing religion proves to be catalytic. In Greece, the catechism is preferred, according to the teachings of the prevailing religion. This choice makes it easier for parents to raise their children based on their beliefs, effectively reinforcing the fundamental right established by Article 2 of the additional protocol of the ECHR.
Reference28 articles.
1. Commentary on the Councils of the State judgement 117/2007;Alivizatos;Efarmoges Dioikitikou Dikaiou,2007
2. The Teaching of Religious Education in Public Schools in the Nordic Countries of Europe;Bedmar;Review of European Studies,2014
3. Durham, W. Cole, Torfs, Rik, Kirkham, David M., and Scott, Christine (2012). Islam, Europe and Emerging Legal Issues, Ashgate.
4. Religious Education in Public Schools: An International Human Right Perspective;Evans;Human Rights Law Review,2008
5. Directions in Religious Pluralism in Europe: Mobilizations in the Shadow of European Court of Human Rights Religious Freedom Jurisprudence;Fokas;Oxford Journal of Law and Religion,2015