Research Quality of Clinical Trials Reported for Foods with Function Claims in Japan, 2023–2024: Evaluation Based on a Revised Tool to Assess Risk of Bias in Randomized Trials

Author:

Kamioka Hiroharu1,Kitayuguchi Jun2,Origasa Hideki3,Tsutani Kiichiro4

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Regional Environment Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture, 1-1-1 Sakuragaoka, Setagaya-ku 156-8502, Tokyo, Japan

2. Physical Education and Medicine Research Center Unnan, 328 Uji, Unnan City 699-1105, Shimane, Japan

3. Institute of Statistical Mathematic, 10-3 Midori-cho, Tachikawa City 190-8562, Tokyo, Japan

4. The Institute of Seizon and Life Sciences, 4-5-1 Ginza, Chuo-ku 104-0061, Tokyo, Japan

Abstract

Background: The Foods with Function Claim was introduced in Japan in April 2015 to make more products available that are labeled with health functions. A product’s functionality of function claims must be explained by the scientific evidence presented in clinical trials (CTs) or systematic reviews, but the quality of recent CTs is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk of bias (RoB) using “a revised tool to assess risk (RoB 2)” published in 2018 for notifications based on all recent CTs published on the Consumer Affairs Agency website. Methods: A total of 38 submitted papers based on CTs that were published on the Consumer Affairs Agency website during the period from 1 January 2023 to 30 June 2024 were eligible. The RoB 2 tool provides a framework for considering the risk of bias in the findings of any type of randomized trial. This tool with five domains was used to evaluate the quality of research methods. Results: Eligible CTs were assessed as “low risk” (11%, n = 4), “medium risk” (13%, n = 5), and “high risk” (76%, n = 29). A number of highly biased papers were published. Bias occurred in all five domains, especially “bias in selection of the reported result (Domain 5)”, which was the most serious (“high risk”; 75%). For elements correlated with RoB, there was no significant difference (p = 0.785) in the RoB 2 score between for-profit and academic research in the author’s affiliated organization. There was no significant difference (p = 0.498) in the RoB score between the published year categories of 2000–2019 and 2020–2024, and no significant difference (p = 0.643) in the RoB score between English and Japanese language publications. Conclusion: Overall, the quality of the latest CTs submitted after 2023 was very low, occurring in all five domains, and was most serious for “bias in selection of the reported result (Domain 5)”.

Funder

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference38 articles.

1. Consumer Affairs Agency. Government of Japan (2024, July 10). Introduction, Available online: https://www.caa.go.jp/policies/policy/food_labeling/information/pamphlets/pdf/151224_2.pdf.

2. Consumer Affairs Agency. Government of Japan (2023, July 12). Guideline (Updated April 2023), Available online: https://www.caa.go.jp/policies/policy/food_labeling/foods_with_function_claims/assets/foods_with_function_claims_210322_0002.pdf.

3. Consumer Affairs Agency. Government of Japan (2024, July 01). Notification Information Search Site, Available online: https://www.fld.caa.go.jp/caaks/cssc01/.

4. Consumer Affairs Agency. Government of Japan (2024, July 10). Verification of Scientific Evidence on Effectiveness of the System of “Foods with Function Claim”: Assessment of the Submitted Systematic Literature Reviews (Digest Edition), Available online: https://www.caa.go.jp/policies/policy/food_labeling/foods_with_function_claims/pdf/about_food_with_function_report_180416_0001.pdf.

5. Consumer Affairs Agency. Government of Japan (2024, July 10). Verification of Scientific Evidence on “Foods with Function Claims”: Assessment of the Submitted Clinical Trials, Available online: https://www.caa.go.jp/policies/policy/food_labeling/foods_with_function_claims/pdf/foods_index_23_171025_0001.pdf.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3