Abstract
Glyphosate-based pesticides are the highest-volume used herbicides worldwide. International concerns regarding the potential human adverse effects of glyphosate exposures have heightened since IARC classified glyphosate as probably carcinogenic to humans. Human biomonitoring (HBM) studies have identified ubiquitous exposure to glyphosate and its main breakdown product, aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA), from environmental exposures. The IMAGE research project aimed to investigate farm and non-farm families’ exposure to glyphosate while aligning with the Human Biomonitoring for Europe (HBM4EU) initiative. The study recruited non-farm and farm families (who use glyphosate on their farms). Each family member provided a urine sample that was analysed using gas chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry, with a limit of quantification of 0.05 µg/L for glyphosate and AMPA. In addition to general information on background exposures in farm and non-farm families, we investigated relationships in exposure between families and family members. We recruited 68 families, including 54 non-farm and 14 farm families (180 vs. 45 individuals). Some pesticide users (n = 14, all male farmers) had slightly elevated AMPA levels compared to other adult participants but, overall, we observed no significant differences between farm and non-farm families. The main metabolite, AMPA, was quantifiable in twice as many samples as glyphosate (61% vs. 32%), with a maximum concentration of 7.24 µg/L vs. 3.21 µg/L. Compared to previous studies, exposure levels were relatively low and far below current health-based guidance values (3% or less for glyphosate and AMPA). Study results suggest potential exposures from residential co-exposures or living with a pesticide user. This is the first study internationally to investigate glyphosate and AMPA across family members (farm and non-farm). We found comparably low glyphosate and AMPA exposures among these families. These results enhance our understanding of glyphosate exposures for different demographic groups and contribute to the scientific knowledge on exposures required for regulatory risk assessments and the re-evaluation of glyphosate in 2022 by the European Commission.
Funder
Irish Research Council and from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie
Subject
Chemical Health and Safety,Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Toxicology
Reference77 articles.
1. EFSA (2015). Conclusion on the Peer Review of the Pesticide Risk Assessment of the Active Substance Glyphosate, European Food Safety Authority. Available online: https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/4302.
2. Trends in glyphosate herbicide use in the United States and globally;Environ. Sci. Eur.,2016
3. Carcinogenicity of tetrachlorvinphos, parathion, malathion, diazinon, and glyphosate;Lancet,2015
4. Antier, C., Kudsk, P., Reboud, X., Ulber, L., Baret, P., and Messéan, A. (2020). Glyphosate Use in the European Agricultural Sector and a Framework for Its Further Monitoring. Sustainability, 12.
5. IARC (2016). IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans—Glyphosate, International Agency for Research on Cancer. Available online: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol112/mono112-10.pdf.
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献