Assessing Produce Growers’ Perceptions and Adoption of Agricultural Water Safety Practices in the United States

Author:

Kalauni Dharmendra1ORCID,Warner Laura A.12ORCID,Benge Matt1ORCID,Danyluk Michelle D.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Agricultural Education & Communication, University of Florida, P.O. Box 110540, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA

2. Center for Land Use Efficiency, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32609, USA

3. UF/IFAS Citrus Research and Education Center, University of Florida, 700 Experiment Station Rd., Lake Alfred, FL 33850, USA

Abstract

The Produce Rule regulates food safety among produce growers in the United States. Policy exemptions (e.g., for farms with average produce sales under USD 30,000 over three years) pose a threat to local food safety, particularly given exempt growers’ role in fresh produce production. Understanding exempt growers’ perceptions of food safety practices and the factors influencing their voluntary adoption is crucial. A cross-sectional quantitative survey was conducted to assess growers’ current engagement, their perceptions of agricultural water safety practices, and their influence on adoption decisions. The findings indicate inadequate engagement with agricultural water safety practices, with production water-related safety practices showing higher engagement compared to post-harvest water practices. Overall, growers reported favorable perceptions toward agricultural water safety practices. The perceived compatibility, relative advantage, and observability predicted adoption decisions among exempt growers, with the perceived compatibility being the strongest predictor. Policymakers and education professionals should design strategies and tailored educational interventions and messaging for exempt growers to emphasize the compatibility, relative advantage, and observability of agricultural water safety practices. Furthermore, it is recommended to explore policies and other mechanisms to increase the perceived relative advantage (immediacy of rewards and direct benefits) for exempt growers to promote voluntary adoption of these on-farm food safety practices.

Funder

USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference97 articles.

1. Gupta, R.K., Dudeja, P., and Minhas, A.S. (2017). Foodborne Diseases-Disease Burden. Food Safety in the 21st Century, Academic Press.

2. Etiological Agents Implicated in Foodborne Illness Worldwide;Lee;Food Sci. Anim. Resour.,2021

3. World Health Organization (2022). Draft WHO Global Strategy for Food Safety 2022-2030: Towards Stronger Food Safety Systems and Global Cooperation, World Health Organization. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240057685.

4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2024, June 26). Estimates of Foodborne Illness in the United States, Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/foodborneburden/2011-foodborne-estimates.html.

5. Attribution of Foodborne Illnesses, Hospitalizations, and Deaths to Food Commodities by Using Outbreak Data, United States, 1998–2008;Painter;Emerg. Infect. Dis.,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3