Abstract
Commercial deployment of maritime autonomous surface ships (MASSs) is close to becoming a reality. Although MASSs are fully autonomous, the industry will still allow remote operations centre (ROC) operators to intervene if a MASS is facing an emergency the MASS cannot handle by itself. A human-centred design for the associated emergency response systems will require attention to the ROC operator workplace, but also, arguably, to the behaviour-shaping constraints on the engineers building these systems. There is thus a need for an engineer-centred design of engineering organisations, influenced by the current discourse on human factors. To contribute to the discourse, think-aloud protocol interviewing was conducted with well-informed maritime operators to elicit fundamental demands on cognition and collaboration by maritime autonomy emergency response systems. Based on the results, inferences were made regarding both design factors and methodological choices for future, early phase engineering of emergency response systems. Firstly, engineering firms have to improve their informal gathering and sharing of information through gatekeepers and/or organisational liaisons. To avoid a too cautious approach to accountability, this will have to include a closer integration of development and operations. Secondly, associated studies taking the typical approach of exposing relevant operators to new design concepts in scripted scenarios should include significant flexibility and less focus on realism.
Funder
Assuring Autonomy International Programme
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Safety Research,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
Reference75 articles.
1. Definitions for Autonomous Merchant Ships. Report
https://nfas.autonomous-ship.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/autonom-defs.pdf
2. Legal Issues Relating to the Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships’ Development and Introduction to Services;Iwanaga;Master’s Thesis,2019
3. Identification of Information Requirements in ROC Operations Room,2020
4. A framework to identify factors influencing navigational risk for Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships
5. MSC. 1/Circ. 1638—Outcome of the Regulatory Scoping Exercise for the Use of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS)
https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/MediaCentre/PressBriefings/Documents/MSC.1-Circ.1638%20-%20Outcome%20Of%20The%20Regulatory%20Scoping%20ExerciseFor%20The%20Use%20Of%20Maritime%20Autonomous%20Surface%20Ships...%20(Secretariat).pdf#:~:text=1%20The%20Maritime%20Safety%20Committee%2C%20at%20its%20103rd,be%20affected%20in%20order%20to%20address%20MASS%20operations
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献