Seasonal Dynamics and Physiological Age of Ixodid Ticks Collected from Dogs
Author:
Petrović Aleksandra1ORCID, Stanić Ksenija12, Popović Aleksandra1ORCID, Ivanović Ivana1ORCID, Supić Dejan3ORCID, Marinković Dušan1, Bursić Vojislava1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 8, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia 2. Agro-Vet, Šenoina 16/I, 24000 Subotica, Serbia 3. Faculty of Ecological Agriculture, University Educons, Vojvode Putnika 87, 21208 Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
Abstract
In order to reproduce and complete life cycles, ticks have to feed on different hosts, thus participating as vectors and reservoirs in the maintenance and circulation of different pathogens. Since dogs can serve as suitable hosts for numerous tick species, the aims of this study were to determine tick species and their seasonal occurrence on pet dogs and to compare the accuracy of three indices frequently used to calculate engorged female physiological age. Ticks were collected from dogs brought to veterinary clinics. Three indices were analyzed: scutal index, alloscutal/scutal index ratio, and physiological age index. Four tick species were identified: Ixodes ricinus, Dermacentor marginatus, D. reticulatus, and Rhipicephalus sanguineus group, and the last was the most abundant. The highest number of collected ticks was in April, but two species were continuously active throughout the year. The statistical analyses distinguished the physiological age index as more precise because of lower variability. Dog owners usually ignore regular dog anti-tick treatments throughout the year, as they are not aware that ticks could be active during the winter months. Tick surveillance is unquestionably important in order to monitor and prevent the distribution of these vectors and also the diseases they transmit.
Subject
General Veterinary,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference59 articles.
1. The increasing recognition of rickettsial pathogens in dogs and people;Nicholson;Trends Parasitol.,2010 2. De la Fuente, J., Villar, M., Cabezas-Cruz, A., Estrada-Peña, A., Ayllón, N., and Alberdi, P. (2016). Tick–Host–Pathogen Interactions: Conflict and Cooperation. PLoS Pathog., 12. 3. Namina, A., Capligina, V., Selezņova, M., Krumins, R., Aleinikova, D., Kivrane, A., Akopjana, S., Lazovska, M., Berzina, I., and Ranka, R. (2019). Tick-borne pathogens in ticks collected from dogs, Latvia, 2011–2016. BMC Vet. Res., 15. 4. Epidemiological consequences of host specificity of ticks (Ixodida);Kiewra;Ann. Parasitol.,2012 5. Zanet, S., Battisti, E., Pepe, P., Ciuca, L., Colombo, L., Trisciuoglio, A., Ferroglio, E., Cringoli, G., Rinaldi, L., and Maurelli, M.P. (2020). Tick-borne pathogens in Ixodidae ticks collected from privately-owned dogs in Italy: A country-wide molecular survey. BMC Vet. Res., 16.
|
|