Abstract
For nine popular geometrical visual-illusion figures, a mathematical analysis is provided along with a characterization of the figures’ psychological effectiveness. Supported by graphical illustrations, for the L and the T, it is shown how mathematical singularities of these figures can be isolated, and the illusions annihilated. For the Poggendorff, the Hering, and the Zöllner figures, building on observations from Kennedy and Portal (1990), sighting the figures from specific vantage points at a shallow angle is proposed as a means to overcome these illusions. For the T, the Oppel–Kundt, the Müller–Lyer, and the Ebbinghaus figures, a new experiment demonstrated that observers were able to find a slant of the stimuli at which the illusory impressions vanished. Task demands on part of the beholders comprise discrimination and identification. The observed independence of response bias and sensitivity in psychometric functions can possibly be explained by the intrusion of identifying responses into discrimination tasks.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Subject
Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous),General Mathematics,Chemistry (miscellaneous),Computer Science (miscellaneous)
Reference66 articles.
1. Coren, S., and Girgus, J.S. (1978). Seeing is Deceiving: The Psychology of Visual Illusions, Erlbaum.
2. Geometrical-optical illusions at isoluminance;Hamburger;Vis. Res.,2007
3. Graefe, A., and Saemisch, T. (1925). Handbuch der Gesamten Augenheilkunde, Springer. [2nd ed.]. Chapter 13, Part I.
4. Robinson, J.O. (1972). The Psychology of Visual Illusion, Hutchinson.
5. Illusions in the spatial sense of the eye: Geometrical-optical illusions and the neural representation of space;Westheimer;Vis. Res.,2008
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献