Spatial Distribution and Hierarchical Behaviour of Cattle Using a Virtual Fence System
Author:
Lund Silje Marquardsen1ORCID, Jacobsen Johanne Holm1ORCID, Nielsen Maria Gytkjær1, Friis Marie Ribergaard1, Nielsen Natalie Hvid1, Mortensen Nina Østerhaab1, Skibsted Regitze Cushion1, Aaser Magnus Fjord1ORCID, Staahltoft Søren Krabbe1ORCID, Bruhn Dan1ORCID, Sonne Christian2, Alstrup Aage Kristian Olsen34ORCID, Frikke John5, Pertoldi Cino16ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 7H, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark 2. Department of Ecoscience, Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark 3. Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark 4. Department of Clinical Research, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark 5. Wadden Sea National Park, Havnebyvej 30, 6792 Rømø, Denmark 6. Aalborg Zoo, Mølleparkvej 63, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark
Abstract
Interest in virtual fencing has increased due to its flexibility for agriculture and rewilding. However, systems like Nofence© require large financial investments, and the need for individual collars complicates large-scale use. If cattle herds maintain cohesive groups around leading individuals, fewer collars could be used, thereby enhancing cost efficiency. This study investigates the pattern in spatial distribution in a herd of 17 Angus cows on Fanø in Denmark with GPS locations, using a Nofence© system. The aim of this paper is to determine how individuals position themselves in a herd, spatially, and identify a pattern in ranks. The method used in this study examines the distances between an individual to the rest of the herdmates using nearest neighbour and descriptive statistics. Contrary to expectations, this study did not reveal a distinct pattern in herd distribution. While some tendencies in spatial distribution patterns were observed, only a low concordance could be found (W=0.15,p<0.001), indicating great variability in the cattle’s ranks. A cumulative curve of the ranks estimated over the entire periods, however, allowed a rough estimation of the hierarchy and allowed identification of the highest-ranked cows, making the use of a cumulative curve a possible solution to finding the high-ranked cows. This research underscores the complexity of cattle social structures and highlights the need for extended observation periods and alternative methodologies to enhance the cost-effectiveness and scalability of virtual fencing in agricultural and rewilding contexts.
Funder
15. Juni Fonden Hedeselskabet Markus Jebsens Naturpulje
Reference42 articles.
1. Pereira, H.M., and Navarro, L.M. (2015). Rewildning European Landscapes, Springer. 2. European Commission (2021). EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030: Bringing Nature Back into Our Lives, Publications Office of the European Union, The European Commission. 3. Guiding principles for rewilding;Carver;Conserv. Biol.,2021 4. Fløjgaard, C., Buttenschøn, R.M., Byriel, D.B., Clausen, K.K., Gottlieb, L., Kanstrup, N., Strandberg, B., and Ejrnæs, R. (2021). Biodiversitetseffekter af Rewilding, DCE: Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi, of Aarhus Universitet, Institut for Bioscience and København Universitet, Institut for Geovidenskab og Naturforvaltning. 5. Fencing for conservation Restriction of evolutionary potential or a riposte to threatening processes;Hayward;Biol. Conserv.,2009
|
|