Abstract
Two important trends in applied statistics are an increased usage of geospatial models and an increased usage of big data. Naturally, there has been overlap as analysts utilize the techniques associated with each. With geospatial methods such as kriging, the computation required becomes intensive quickly, even with datasets that would not be considered huge in other contexts. In this work we describe a solution to the computational problem of estimating Bayesian kriging models with big data, Bootstrap Random Spatial Sampling (BRSS), and first provide an analytical argument that BRSS produces consistent estimates from the Bayesian spatial model. Second, with a medium-sized dataset on fracking in West Virginia, we show that bootstrap sample effects from a full-information Bayesian model are reduced with more bootstrap samples and more observations per sample as in standard bootstrapping. Third, we offer a realistic illustration of the method by analyzing campaign donors in California with a large geocoded dataset. With this solution, scholars will not be constrained in their ability to apply theoretically relevant geospatial Bayesian models when the size of the data produces computational intractability.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Subject
General Mathematics,Engineering (miscellaneous),Computer Science (miscellaneous)
Reference38 articles.
1. Measuring Constituency Ideology Using Bayesian Universal Kriging;Gill;State Politics Policy Q.,2021
2. Measuring State and District Ideology with Spatial Realignment;Monogan;Political Sci. Res. Methods,2016
3. Gill, J. Bayesian Methods: A Social and Behavioral Sciences Approach, 2014.
4. Banerjee, S., Carlin, B.P., and Gelfand, A.E. Hierarchical Modeling and Analysis for Spatial Data, 2015.
5. Principles of Geostatistics;Matheron;Econ. Geol.,1963
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献