Suitability of Polymers for 3D-Printing Laboratory Models for Shaking Table Experiments: Discussion and Indications

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive assessment of the suitability of seven commercially available polymers for crafting laboratory models designed for dynamic shaking-table tests using 3D-printing technology. The objective was to determine whether 3D-printed polymer models are effective for dynamic assessments of structures. The polymers underwent experimental investigations to assess their material properties, i.e., the elastic modulus, the mass density, and the limit of linear-elastic behaviour. The following methodology was applied to obtain the correct values of elasticity moduli and yield points of the polymers: (1) the uniaxial tensile test, (2) the compression test, and (3) the three-point loading test. The filament density was determined as the ratio of sample mass to its volume. The results indicate substantial variations in stiffness, density, and elasticity limits among them. For the similarity analysis, an existing reinforced concrete chimney 120 m high was chosen as a prototype. A geometric similarity scale of 1:120 for a laboratory mock-up was adopted, and a numerical model of the mock-up was created. The similarity scales were calculated for mock-ups made of each filament. Based on these scales, numerical calculations of natural frequencies and dynamic performance under a strong earthquake were carried out for models made of different polymers. Assessment of the polymers’ suitability for laboratory models revealed positive outcomes. The agreement between field experiments, shaking-table tests, and numerical predictions in terms of natural frequencies was observed. Maximum stresses resulting from the earthquake indicated the satisfactory performance of the model below the linear-elastic limit. Despite differences in material properties, the selected polymers were deemed suitable for 3D-printing models for shaking-table tests. However, the discussion raised some important considerations. The upper frequency limit of the shaking-table imposes restrictions on the number of natural frequencies that can be determined. Numerical assessments of natural frequencies are recommended to prevent underestimation and to assess the feasibility of their determination. Additionally, resonance during natural frequency determination may lead to exceeding the linear-elastic limit, affecting filament properties, and making the similarity criteria invalid. Practically, this research contributes insights for planning shaking-table tests, aiding in selecting the most suitable filament and highlighting crucial considerations to ensure reliable and accurate dynamic assessments.