Biologics in T2 Severe Asthma: Unveiling Different Effectiveness by Real-World Indirect Comparison

Author:

Riccardi Elisa12,Guida Giuseppe23,Garino Sonia2,Bertolini Francesca2ORCID,Carriero Vitina2ORCID,Brusamento Mattia4,Pizzimenti Stefano3,Giannoccaro Fabiana3,Falzone Erica2,Arrigo Elisa2,Levra Stefano2ORCID,Ricciardolo Fabio Luigi Massimo235ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Regional Hospital Parini, Pulmonology Unit, Aosta, 11100 Aosta, Italy

2. Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, Orbassano, 10043 Turin, Italy

3. Severe Asthma, Rare Lung Disease and Respiratory Pathophysiology, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, Orbassano, 10043 Turin, Italy

4. Re Learn S.R.L., 10122 Turin, Italy

5. Institute of Translational Pharmacology, National Research Council (IFT-CNR), Section of Palermo, 90146 Palermo, Italy

Abstract

Background: Indirect comparison among biologics in severe asthma (SA) is a challenging but desirable goal for clinicians in real life. The aim of the study is to define characteristics of a biologic-treated T2-driven-SA population and to evaluate the effectiveness of biologic treatments in a real-world setting by variation in intra/inter-biologic parameters in an up to 4-year follow-up. Methods: Demographic, clinical, functional, and biological characteristics were evaluated retrospectively in 104 patients recruited until July 2022 at baseline (T0) and over a maximum of 4 years (T4) of biologic therapy (omalizumab/OmaG = 41, from T0 to T4, mepolizumab/MepoG = 26, from T0 to T4, benralizumab/BenraG = 18, from T0 to T2, and dupilumab/DupiG = 19, from T0 to T1). Variations of parameters using means of paired Delta were assessed. Results: At baseline, patients had high prevalence of T2-driven comorbidities, low asthma control test (ACT mean 17.65 ± 4.41), impaired pulmonary function (FEV1 65 ± 18 %pred), frequent exacerbations/year (AEs 3.5 ± 3), and OCS dependence (60%). DupiG had lower T2 biomarkers/comorbidities and AEs, and worse FEV1 (57 ± 19 %pred) compared to other biologics (p < 0.05). All biologics improved ACT, FEV1%, FVC%, AEs rate, and OCS use. FEV1% improved in MepoG and BenraG over the minimal clinically important difference and was sustained over 4 years in OmaG and MepoG. A significant RV reduction in OmaG (T4) and DupiG (T1), and BenraG normalization (T2) of airflow limitation were found. We observed through inter-biologic parameters pair delta variation comparison a significant nocturnal awakenings reduction in BenraG vs. OmaG/MepoG, and neutrophils reduction in BenraG/DupiG vs. OmaG. Conclusions: Indirect comparison among biologics unveils clinical and functional improvements that may mark a different effectiveness. These results may highlight the preference of a single biologic compared to another with regard to specific treatable traits.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference48 articles.

1. International ERS/ATS guidelines on definition, evaluation and treatment of severe asthma;Chung;Eur. Respir. J.,2014

2. Asthma phenotypes: The evolution from clinical to molecular approaches;Wenzel;Nat. Med.,2012

3. Biologics for severe asthma—Which, when and why?;Shah;Respirology,2023

4. Tezepelumab for Severe Asthma: One Drug Targeting Multiple Disease Pathways and Patient Types;Panettieri;J. Asthma Allergy,2024

5. The overlapping eligibility for biologics in patients with severe asthma and phenotypes;Ito;Arerugi,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3