The Value of Mandibular Indices on Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Secondary Causes of Low Bone Mass
-
Published:2024-08-16
Issue:16
Volume:13
Page:4854
-
ISSN:2077-0383
-
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Medicine
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JCM
Author:
Poiană Ioana Ruxandra1, Dobre Ramona23, Pițuru Silviu-Mirel1, Bucur Alexandru1
Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Dentistry, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania 2. Faculty of Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania 3. Department of Endocrinology, National Institute of Endocrinology C. I. Parhon, 011853 Bucharest, Romania
Abstract
Background: As implant treatment cases increase, many cases of failure/side effects also occur. Generally, dental clinics determine the density of the jawbone using cone beam CT (CBCT). Considering the known potential role of this tool for bone assessment in primary osteoporosis, this study evaluated patients with secondary endocrine causes of low bone mass. Methods: The study included 83 patients with endocrine causes of osteoporosis who were evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), trabecular bone score (TBS), and mental foramen (MF) region CBCT. The following CBCT indices were measured: anterior (A)—thickness of inferior mandibular cortex 10 mm anterior from MF; molar (M)—thickness of inferior mandibular cortex 10 mm posterior from MF; posterior (P)—thickness of inferior mandibular cortex 25 mm posterior from MF; symphysis (S)—thickness of inferior mandibular cortex equidistant from the centers of right and left MF. Results: The highest correlation coefficient in the secondary causes group was between the A index and the lumbar BMD (r = 0.375, p = 0.001) and the P index and the femoral neck BMD (r = 0.38, p = 0.001). Hypercortisolism seems to be the most predictable cause of secondary osteoporosis using the A, M, and P indices. The A, M, and P indices showed predictive values of the bone micro-architecture that was evaluated using TBS score, and were statistically significant. The symphysis index does not significantly predict osteoporosis or impaired bone micro-architecture. Conclusions: These findings support the potential usefulness of A, M, and P CBCT-derived radiomorphometric mandibular indices in secondary osteoporosis, underlining the well-known effects of these pathologies on bone micro-architecture rather than bone quantity.
Funder
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
Reference42 articles.
1. Secondary Osteoporosis;Ebeling;Endocr. Rev.,2022 2. Management of endocrine disease: Secondary osteoporosis: Pathophysiology and management;Mirza;Eur. J. Endocrinol.,2015 3. Feingold, K.R., Anawalt, B., Blackman, M.R., Boyce, A., Chrousos, G., Corpas, E., Herder, W.W., Dhatariya, K., and Dungan, K. (2000). The Epidemiology and Pathogenesis of Osteoporosis, MDText.com, Inc. 4. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work?;Scarfe;Dent. Clin. N. Am.,2008 5. Analysis of mandible trabecular structure using digital periapical radiographs to assess low bone quality in postmenopausal women;Diba;Saudi Dent. J.,2021
|
|