Development and Validation of a Method of Body Volume and Fat Mass Estimation Using Three-Dimensional Image Processing with a Mexican Sample

Author:

García Flores Fabián Ituriel1ORCID,Klünder Klünder Miguel2ORCID,López Teros Miriam Teresa3,Muñoz Ibañez Cristopher Antonio4,Padilla Castañeda Miguel Angel5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Mexico City 04510, Mexico

2. Research Subdirectorate, Children’s Hospital of Mexico Federico Gómez, Dr. Marquez St. 162, Colonia Doctores, Mexico City 06720, Mexico

3. Health Department, Santa Fe Campus, Iberoamerican University, Prol. Paseo de la Reforma, Zedec Sta Fé, Álvaro Obregón, Mexico City 01219, Mexico

4. Institute of Advanced Materials for Sustainable Manufacturing, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Canal de Miramontes, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14380, Mexico

5. Applied Science and Technology Institute (ICAT), National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Mexico City 04510, Mexico

Abstract

Body composition assessment using instruments such as dual X-ray densitometry (DXA) can be complex and their use is often limited to research. This cross-sectional study aimed to develop and validate a densitometric method for fat mass (FM) estimation using 3D cameras. Using two such cameras, stereographic images, and a mesh reconstruction algorithm, 3D models were obtained. The FM estimations were compared using DXA as a reference. In total, 28 adults, with a mean BMI of 24.5 (±3.7) kg/m2 and mean FM (by DXA) of 19.6 (±5.8) kg, were enrolled. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for body volume (BV) was 0.98–0.99 (95% CI, 0.97–0.99) for intra-observer and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.96–0.99) for inter-observer reliability. The coefficient of variation for kinetic BV was 0.20 and the mean difference (bias) for BV (liter) between Bod Pod and Kinect was 0.16 (95% CI, −1.2 to 1.6), while the limits of agreement (LoA) were 7.1 to −7.5 L. The mean bias for FM (kg) between DXA and Kinect was −0.29 (95% CI, −2.7 to 2.1), and the LoA was 12.1 to −12.7 kg. The adjusted R2 obtained using an FM regression model was 0.86. The measurements of this 3D camera-based system aligned with the reference measurements, showing the system’s feasibility as a simpler, more economical screening tool than current systems.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference39 articles.

1. Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (2022, January 12). National Health and Nutrition Survey on COVID-19. Available online: https://ensanut.insp.mx/encuestas/ensanutcontinua2021/doctos/informes/220804_Ensa21_digital_4ago.pdf.

2. Haua Navarro, K., and Surveza Fernández, A. (2010). El ABCD de la Evaluación del estado de Nutrición, McGrawhill. [1st ed.].

3. Ledesma Solano, J.Á., and Palafox López, M.E. (2015). Manual de Fórmulas y Tablas para la Intervención Nutriológica, McGrawhill. [3rd ed.].

4. Growth, maturation and body composition: The Fels longitudinal study 1929–1991;Wadsworth;J. Epidemiol. Community Health,1993

5. ACSM (2014). Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. [9th ed.].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3