Affiliation:
1. Institute of Materials Science and Engineering, Faculty of Advanced Technologies and Chemistry, Military University of Technology, 2 Kaliskiego Street, 00908 Warsaw, Poland
Abstract
Aluminum technical alloys are well known for their outstanding mechanical properties, especially after heat treatment. However, quenching and aging, which improve the mechanical properties, by the formation of Cu-rich zones and phases that are coherent with the matrix and block the dislocation motion, cause uneven distribution of the elements in the alloy and consequently make it prone to corrosion. One method providing satisfactory corrosion protection of aluminum alloys is anodizing. On an industrial scale, it is usually carried out in electrolytes containing chromates that were found to be cancerogenic and toxic. Therefore, much effort has been undertaken to find substitutions. Currently, there are many Cr(VI)-free substitutes like tartaric–sulfuric acid anodizing or citric–sulfuric acid anodizing. Despite using such approaches even on the industrial scale, Cr(VI)-based anodizing still seems to be superior; therefore, there is an urge to find more complex but more effective approaches in anodizing. The incorporation of anions into anodic alumina from the electrolytes is a commonly known effect. Researchers used this phenomenon to entrap various other anions and organic compounds into anodic alumina to change their properties. In this review paper, the impact of the incorporation of various corrosion inhibitors into anodic alumina on the corrosion performance of the alloys is discussed. It is shown that Mo compounds are promising, especially when combined with organic acids.
Funder
Narodowa Agencja Wymiany Akademickiej
National Science Center
Reference87 articles.
1. Towards Cr(VI)-free anodization of aluminum alloys for aerospace adhesive bonding applications: A review;Abrahami;Front. Chem. Sci. Eng.,2017
2. United States Department of Labor OSHA (2006). Toxic and Hazardous Substances in Occupational Exposure to Hexavalent Chromium. Regulatory Standard 29 CFR 1910.1026 and 29 CFR 1926.1126 Federal Register Number, United States Department of Labor OSHA.
3. Regulation (EC) (1999). No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC 2006. Off. J., L396, 1–849.
4. Koop, R., and Moji, Y. (1992). Boric/Sulfuric Acid Anodize-Alternative to Chromic Acid Anodize, SAE International. SAE Technical Paper.
5. Boric/Sulfuric Acid Anodizing of Aluminum Alloys 2024 and 7075: Film Growth and Corrosion Resistance;Thompson;Corrosion,1999
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献