Affiliation:
1. School of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering and IT, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
Abstract
Socio-economic inequality may be addressed at a different scale. Its impact at a micro and macro level on very many social issues is well-known, as well as its effects on global development being extensively reported in literature, where inequality is often seen as a clear barrier on the path to a sustainable development. That becomes extremely critical in light of major global challenges, such as climate change. The quantification of inequality in the different contexts, its interpretation, as well as its impact on society at a different level are object of major interest and discussion within the scientific community. Inspired by the famous African proverb “if you want to go fast go alone; If you want to go far go together”, we propose an indicator—Walking Together Indicator (WTI), based on a simple model to foster transparency and broad communication. It relies on the statistical standard deviation to facilitate the measurement of inequality looking at single metrics (e.g., GDP) as well as considering broad categories (e.g., Economy) composed of multiple indicators. Despite evident limitations, simplifications (context-less comparison among countries) and approximations (significant lack of data), the study conducted on well-known macro indicators presents a fundamental coherence in the result. Indeed, it shows a reducing inequality in the main trends. On the other side, the performed computations also point out a relevant exception for the main economic indicator, which is characterised, overall, by an increasing inequality among the considered countries. Such a contrasting trend is partially explainable looking at the simplifications in the model, which neither considers dependencies among indicators nor assumes weighting. The indicator provides a very encouraging and optimistic figure. However, the recent pandemic has shown a world running at different speeds. It advises a more conservative interpretation of the indicator as the exception related to economy is relevant.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference82 articles.
1. Measuring the magnitude of socio-economic inequalities in health: An overview of available measures illustrated with two examples from Europe;Mackenbach;Soc. Sci. Med.,1997
2. Socio-economic inequality, human trafficking, and the global slave trade;Barner;Societies,2014
3. Ghosh, S., Doğan, B., Can, M., Shah, M.I., and Apergis, N. (2022). Does economic structure matter for ıncome ınequality?. Qual. Quant.
4. Soubbotina, T.P., and Sheram, K. (2000). Beyond Economic Growth: Meeting the Challenges of Global Development, World Bank Publications.
5. Sustainable development: Mapping different approaches;Hopwood;Sustain. Dev.,2005
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献