Innovation Networks of Science and Technology Firms: Evidence from China

Abstract

Examining and assessing the characteristics of innovation networks among science and technology firms at the city level is essential for comprehending the innovation patterns of cities and improving their competitiveness. Nevertheless, the majority of studies in this field solely rely on patent and paper data, neglecting the analysis of networks across diverse scales and dimensions. Websites offer a novel platform for companies to exhibit their products and services, and the utilization of hyperlink data better captures the dynamics of innovative cooperation. Thus, to attain a more realistic and precise comprehension of China’s technology enterprise cooperation networks, enhance the understanding of intra-city and cross-border cooperation within innovation networks, and offer more scientific guidance to cities in enhancing their innovation capabilities by investigating the factors influencing innovation scenarios and the mechanisms of their interactions, this study constructs an innovation network based on the hyperlink data extracted from Chinese science and technology enterprises’ websites in 2022. It explores the network’s inherent characteristics and spatial patterns across multiple dimensions and scales. Additionally, it employs GeoDetector to analyze the driving factors behind the heterogeneity of city quadrants across each dimension. The findings suggest the following: (1) Evident polarization of innovation capability exists, with a more pronounced differentiation of cities between high capability zones. (2) Contrary to the conventional notion of geographical proximity, cross-region website cooperation prevails, with cross-provincial cooperation being more prevalent than intra-provincial cross-city cooperation. (3) Enterprise cooperation tends to align with partners of similar scale, and small and medium-sized enterprises primarily engage in internal cooperation, primarily concentrated in second and third-tier cities. (4) Cities with high degree centrality and structure holes are primarily located in the construction areas of Chinese urban agglomerations, while those with low degree centrality and structure holes are situated near double-high cities. (5) The spatial heterogeneity of innovation networks across the four dimensions is primarily influenced by STI, while cooperation intensity and innovation capacity dimensions are strongly influenced by traffic capacity. The intra- and inter-city cooperation intensity dimensions are significantly impacted by administrative grade, and the enterprise scale and network location dimensions are most affected by the level of digital infrastructure.