Ensemble Learning for Breast Cancer Lesion Classification: A Pilot Validation Using Correlated Spectroscopic Imaging and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging

Author:

Joy Ajin1ORCID,Lin Marlene1ORCID,Joines Melissa1,Saucedo Andres12,Lee-Felker Stephanie1,Baker Jennifer3,Chien Aichi1,Emir Uzay4ORCID,Macey Paul M.5ORCID,Thomas M. Albert126

Affiliation:

1. Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA

2. Physics and Biology in Medicine-Inter-Departmental Graduate Program, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA

3. Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA

4. School of Health Sciences, College of Health and Human Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA

5. School of Nursing, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA

6. BioEngineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA

Abstract

The main objective of this work was to evaluate the application of individual and ensemble machine learning models to classify malignant and benign breast masses using features from two-dimensional (2D) correlated spectroscopy spectra extracted from five-dimensional echo-planar correlated spectroscopic imaging (5D EP-COSI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Twenty-four different metabolite and lipid ratios with respect to diagonal fat peaks (1.4 ppm, 5.4 ppm) from 2D spectra, and water and fat peaks (4.7 ppm, 1.4 ppm) from one-dimensional non-water-suppressed (NWS) spectra were used as the features. Additionally, water fraction, fat fraction and water-to-fat ratios from NWS spectra and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) from DWI were included. The nine most important features were identified using recursive feature elimination, sequential forward selection and correlation analysis. XGBoost (AUC: 93.0%, Accuracy: 85.7%, F1-score: 88.9%, Precision: 88.2%, Sensitivity: 90.4%, Specificity: 84.6%) and GradientBoost (AUC: 94.3%, Accuracy: 89.3%, F1-score: 90.7%, Precision: 87.9%, Sensitivity: 94.2%, Specificity: 83.4%) were the best-performing models. Conventional biomarkers like choline, myo-Inositol, and glycine were statistically significant predictors. Key features contributing to the classification were ADC, 2D diagonal peaks at 0.9 ppm, 2.1 ppm, 3.5 ppm, and 5.4 ppm, cross peaks between 1.4 and 0.9 ppm, 4.3 and 4.1 ppm, 2.3 and 1.6 ppm, and the triglyceryl–fat cross peak. The results highlight the contribution of the 2D spectral peaks to the model, and they demonstrate the potential of 5D EP-COSI for early breast cancer detection.

Funder

CDMRP grant from the US Army Breast Cancer Research Program

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Molecular Biology,Biochemistry,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3