Affiliation:
1. Research Laboratory in Active Controls, Avionics and Aeroservoelasticity (LARCASE), Department of Systems Engineering, École de Technologie Supérieure, 1100 Notre-Dame West, Montreal, QC H3C1K3, Canada
Abstract
An integrated approach to active flow control is proposed by finding both the drooping leading edge and the morphing trailing edge for flow management. This strategy aims to manage flow separation control by utilizing the synergistic effects of both control mechanisms, which we call the combined morphing leading edge and trailing edge (CoMpLETE) technique. This design is inspired by a bionic porpoise nose and the flap movements of the cetacean species. The motion of this mechanism achieves a continuous, wave-like, variable airfoil camber. The dynamic motion of the airfoil’s upper and lower surface coordinates in response to unsteady conditions is achieved by combining the thickness-to-chord (t/c) distribution with the time-dependent camber line equation. A parameterization model was constructed to mimic the motion around the morphing airfoil at various deflection amplitudes at the stall angle of attack and morphing actuation start times. The mean properties and qualitative trends of the flow phenomena are captured by the transition SST (shear stress transport) model. The effectiveness of the dynamically morphing airfoil as a flow control approach is evaluated by obtaining flow field data, such as velocity streamlines, vorticity contours, and aerodynamic forces. Different cases are investigated for the CoMpLETE morphing airfoil, which evaluates the airfoil’s parameters, such as its morphing location, deflection amplitude, and morphing starting time. The morphing airfoil’s performance is analyzed to provide further insights into the dynamic lift and drag force variations at pre-defined deflection frequencies of 0.5 Hz, 1 Hz, and 2 Hz. The findings demonstrate that adjusting the airfoil camber reduces streamwise adverse pressure gradients, thus preventing significant flow separation. Although the trailing-edge deflection and its location along the chord influence the generation and separation of the leading-edge vortex (LEV), these results show that the combined effect of the morphing leading edge and trailing edge has the potential to mitigate flow separation. The morphing airfoil successfully contributes to the flow reattachment and significantly increases the maximum lift coefficient (cl,max)). This work also broadens its focus to investigate the aerodynamic effects of a dynamically morphing leading and trailing edge, which seamlessly transitions along the side edges. The aerodynamic performance analysis is investigated across varying morphing frequencies, amplitudes, and actuation times.
Reference56 articles.
1. Ellerbeck, S. (2022, December 09). The Aviation Sector Wants to Reach Net Zero by 2050. How Will It Do It? World Economic Forum. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/12/aviation-net-zero-emissions/.
2. Bashir, M., Longtin-Martel, S., Botez, R.M., and Wong, T. (2021). Aerodynamic Design Optimization of a Morphing Leading Edge and Trailing Edge Airfoil–Application on the UAS-S45. Appl. Sci., 11.
3. Morphing wing, UAV and aircraft multidisciplinary studies at the Laboratory of Applied Research in Active Controls, Avionics and AeroServoElasticity LARCASE;Botez;Aerosp. Lab,2018
4. Botez, R.M. (2022, January 3–7). Overview of Morphing Aircraft and Unmanned Aerial Systems Methodologies and Results–Application on the Cessna Citation X, CRJ-700, UAS-S4 and UAS-S45. Proceedings of the AIAA SCITECH 2022 Forum, San Diego, CA, USA.
5. Experimental validation of a new morphing trailing edge system using Price–Païdoussis wind tunnel tests;Communier;Chin. J. Aeronaut.,2019
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献