Comparing Business, Innovation, and Platform Ecosystems: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Author:

Liu Zhe1ORCID,Li Zichen1,Zhang Yudong23ORCID,Mutukumira Anthony N.4ORCID,Feng Yichen1,Cui Yangjie1,Wang Shuzhe1,Wang Jiaji2ORCID,Wang Shuihua25

Affiliation:

1. School of Management, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China

2. School of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK

3. Department of Information Technology, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia

4. School of Food and Advanced Technology, Massey University, Auckland 0745, New Zealand

5. Department of Biological Sciences, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215123, China

Abstract

In recent decades, the term “ecosystem” has garnered substantial attention in scholarly and managerial discourse, featuring prominently in academic and applied contexts. While individual scholars have made significant contributions to the study of various types of ecosystem, there appears to be a research gap marked by a lack of comprehensive synthesis and refinement of findings across diverse ecosystems. This paper systematically addresses this gap through a hybrid methodology, employing bibliometric and content analyses to systematically review the literature from 1993 to 2023. The primary research aim is to critically examine theoretical studies on different ecosystem types, specifically focusing on business, innovation, and platform ecosystems. The methodology of this study involves a content review of the identified literature, combining quantitative bibliometric analyses to differentiate patterns and content analysis for in-depth exploration. The core findings center on refining and summarizing the definitions of business, innovation, and platform ecosystems, shedding light on both commonalities and distinctions. Notably, the research unveils shared characteristics such as openness and diversity across these ecosystems while highlighting significant differences in terms of participants and objectives. Furthermore, the paper delves into the interconnections within these three ecosystem types, offering insights into their dynamics and paving the way for discussions on future research directions. This comprehensive examination not only advances our understanding of business, innovation, and platform ecosystems but also lays the groundwork for future scholarly inquiries in this dynamic and evolving field.

Funder

National Social Science Foundation of China

BHF, UK

Royal Society, UK

MRC, UK

Hope Foundation for Cancer Research, UK

Sino-UK Industrial Fund, UK

GCRF, UK

LIAS, UK

Data Science Enhancement Fund, UK

Fight for Sight, UK

Sino-UK Education Fund, UK

BBSRC, UK

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3