Bill It Right: Evaluating Public Charging Station Usage Behavior under the Presence of Different Pricing Policies

Author:

Fischer Markus1ORCID,Michalk Wibke2ORCID,Hardt Cornelius3ORCID,Bogenberger Klaus1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Chair of Traffic Engineering and Control, Technical University of Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany

2. Campus Chiemgau, Rosenheim Technical University of Applied Sciences, 83278 Traunstein, Germany

3. Fraunhofer Institute for Material Flow and Logistics IML, 83209 Prien am Chiemsee, Germany

Abstract

This study investigates for the first time how public charging infrastructure usage differs under the presence of diverse pricing models. About 3 million charging events from different European countries were classified according to five different pricing models (cost-free, flat-rate, time-based, energy-based, and mixed) and evaluated using various performance indicators such as connection duration; transferred energy volumes; average power; achievable revenue; and the share of charging and idle time for AC, DC, and HPC charging infrastructure. The study results show that the performance indicators differed for the classified pricing models. In addition to the quantitative comparison of the performance indicators, a Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance and a pairwise comparison using the Mann–Whitney-U test were used to show that the data distributions of the defined pricing models were statistically significantly different. The results are discussed from various perspectives on the efficient design of public charging infrastructure. The results show that time-based pricing models can improve the availability of public charging infrastructure, as the connection duration per charging event can be roughly halved compared to other pricing models. Flat-rate pricing models and AC charging infrastructure can support the temporal shift of charging events, such as shifting demand peaks, as charging events usually have several hours of idle time per charging process. By quantifying various performance indicators for different charging technologies and pricing models, the study is relevant for stakeholders involved in the development and operation of public charging infrastructure.

Funder

Seamless Shared Urban Mobility

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference50 articles.

1. Transportation is critical to reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the United States;Bleviss;WIREs Energy Environ.,2021

2. Greenhouse gas emissions and Green Deal in the European Union;Petrescu;Front. Environ. Sci.,2023

3. Greenhouse Gas Emissions (2021). Total U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Economic Sector in 2021, United States Environmental Protection Agency.

4. (2024, April 17). Transport and Mobility. Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/topics/in-depth/transport-and-mobility?activeTab=fa515f0c-9ab0-493c-b4cd-58a32dfaae0a.

5. Publications Office of the European Union (2022). EU Transport in Figures: Statistical Pocketbook, Publications Office of the European Union.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3