Near-Infrared Transflectance Spectroscopy Discriminates Solutions Containing Two Commercial Formulations of Botulinum Toxin Type A Diluted at Recommended Volumes for Clinical Reconstitution

Abstract

Botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) is the active substance in pharmaceutical preparations widely used worldwide for the highly effective treatment of various disorders. Among the three commercial formulations of BoNT-A currently available in Italy for neurological indications, abobotulinum A toxin (Dysport®, Ipsen SpA, Milano, Italy) and incobotulinum A toxin (Xeomin®, Merz Pharma Italia srl, Milano, Italy) differ in the content of neurotoxin, non-toxic protein, and excipients. Clinical applications of BoNT-A adopt extremely diluted solutions (10−6 mg/mL) for injection in the target body district. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and chemometrics allow rapid, non-invasive, and non-destructive methods for qualitative and quantitative analysis. No data are available to date on the chemometric analysis of the spectral fingerprints acquired from the diluted commercial formulations of BoNT-A. In this proof-of-concept study, we tested whether NIRS can categorize solutions of incobotulinum A toxin (lacking non-toxic proteins) and abobotulinum A toxin (containing non-toxic proteins). Distinct excipients in the two formulations were also analyzed. We acquired transmittance spectra in the visible and short-wave infrared regions (350–2500 nm) by an ASD FieldSpec 4™ Standard-Res Spectrophotoradiometer, using a submerged dip probe designed to read spectra in transflectance mode from liquid samples. After preliminary spectra pre-processing, principal component analysis was applied to characterize the spectral features of the two BoNT-A solutions and those of the various excipients diluted according to clinical standards. Partial least squares-discriminant analysis was used to implement a classification model able to discriminate the BoNT-A solutions and excipients. NIRS distinguished solutions containing distinct BoNT-A commercial formulations (abobotulinum A toxin vs. incobotulinum A toxin) diluted at recommended volumes for clinical reconstitution, distinct proteins (HSA vs. incobotulinum A toxin), very diluted solutions of simple sugars (lactose vs. sucrose), and saline or water. Predictive models of botulinum toxin formulations were also performed with the highest precision and accuracy.