Affiliation:
1. Advanced Research Center on Electronic Systems “Ercole De Castro” (ARCES), University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy
2. Department of Electrical, Electronic and Information Engineering (DEI), University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy
Abstract
The timely diagnosis of defects at their incipient stage of formation is crucial to extending the life-cycle of technical appliances. This is the case of mechanical-related stress, either due to long aging degradation processes (e.g., corrosion) or in-operation forces (e.g., impact events), which might provoke detrimental damage, such as cracks, disbonding or delaminations, most commonly followed by the release of acoustic energy. The localization of these sources can be successfully fulfilled via adoption of acoustic emission (AE)-based inspection techniques through the computation of the time of arrival (ToA), namely the time at which the induced mechanical wave released at the occurrence of the acoustic event arrives to the acquisition unit. However, the accurate estimation of the ToA may be hampered by poor signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). In these conditions, standard statistical methods typically fail. In this work, two alternative deep learning methods are proposed for ToA retrieval in processing AE signals, namely a dilated convolutional neural network (DilCNN) and a capsule neural network for ToA (CapsToA). These methods have the additional benefit of being portable on resource-constrained microprocessors. Their performance has been extensively studied on both synthetic and experimental data, focusing on the problem of ToA identification for the case of a metallic plate. Results show that the two methods can achieve localization errors which are up to 70% more precise than those yielded by conventional strategies, even when the SNR is severely compromised (i.e., down to 2 dB). Moreover, DilCNN and CapsNet have been implemented in a tiny machine learning environment and then deployed on microcontroller units, showing a negligible loss of performance with respect to offline realizations.
Subject
Computer Networks and Communications,Human-Computer Interaction
Reference51 articles.
1. Acoustic emission monitoring of bridges: Review and case studies;Nair;Eng. Struct.,2010
2. Pedersen, J.F., Schlanbusch, R., Meyer, T.J., Caspers, L.W., and Shanbhag, V.V. (2021). Acoustic Emission-Based Condition Monitoring and Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Hydraulic Cylinder Rod Seals. Sensors, 21.
3. Madarshahian, R., Ziehl, P., and Todd, M.D. (2020). Model Validation and Uncertainty Quantification, Volume 3, Springer.
4. Zonzini, F., Bogomolov, D., Dhamija, T., Testoni, N., De Marchi, L., and Marzani, A. (2022). Deep Learning Approaches for Robust Time of Arrival Estimation in Acoustic Emission Monitoring. Sensors, 22.
5. Intelligent AE signal filtering methods;Barat;J. Acoust. Emiss.,2010
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献