Abstract
Cloud vendors offer a variety of serverless technologies promising high availability and dynamic scaling while reducing operational and maintenance costs. One such technology, serverless computing, or function-as-a-service (FaaS), is advertised as a good candidate for web applications, data-processing, or backend services, where you only pay for usage. Unlike virtual machines (VMs), they come with automatic resource provisioning and allocation, providing elastic and automatic scaling. We present the results from our investigation of a specific serverless candidate, Web Application Programming Interface or Web API, deployed on virtual machines and as function(s)-as-a-service. We contrast these deployments by varying the number of concurrent users for measuring response times and costs. We found no significant response time differences between deployments when VMs are configured for the expected load, and test scenarios are within the FaaS hardware limitations. Higher numbers of concurrent users or unexpected user growths are effortlessly handled by FaaS, whereas additional labor must be invested in VMs for equivalent results. We identified that despite the advantages serverless computing brings, there is no clear choice between serverless or virtual machines for a Web API application because one needs to carefully measure costs and factor-in all components that are included with FaaS.
Subject
Computer Networks and Communications,Human-Computer Interaction
Reference31 articles.
1. Magic Quadrant for Cloud Infrastructure as a Service 2018https://therolle.com/magic-quadrant-for-cloud-2018/
2. Serverless Computinghttps://aws.amazon.com/serverless/
3. Serverless in Azurehttps://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/solutions/serverless/
4. Serverless Computinghttps://cloud.google.com/serverless/
5. AWS Lambda Pricinghttps://aws.amazon.com/lambda/pricing/
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献