Pain Detection in Biophysiological Signals: Knowledge Transfer from Short-Term to Long-Term Stimuli Based on Distance-Specific Segment Selection

Author:

Ricken Tobias Benjamin1ORCID,Bellmann Peter1ORCID,Walter Steffen2ORCID,Schwenker Friedhelm1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Neural Information Processing, Ulm University, James-Franck-Ring, 89081 Ulm, Germany

2. Medical Psychology Group, University Clinic, 89075 Ulm, Germany

Abstract

In this study, we analyze a signal segmentation-specific pain duration transfer task by applying knowledge transfer from short-term (phasic) pain stimuli to long-term (tonic) pain stimuli. To this end, we focus on the physiological signals of the X-ITE Pain Database. We evaluate different distance-based segment selection approaches with the aim of identifying individual segments of the corresponding tonic stimuli that lead to the best classification performance. The phasic domain is used to train the classification model. In the first main step, we compute class-specific prototypes for the phasic domain. In the second main step, we compute the distances between all segments of the tonic samples and each prototype. The segment with the lowest distance to the prototypes is then fed to the classifier. Our analysis includes the evaluation of a variety of distance metrics, namely the Euclidean, Bray–Curtis, Canberra, Chebyshev, City-Block and Wasserstein distances. Our results show that in combination with most of the metrics used, the distance-based selection of one individual segment outperforms the naive approach in which the tonic stimuli are fed to the phasic domain-based classification model without any adaptation. Moreover, most of the evaluated distance-based segment selection approaches lead to outcomes that are close to the classification performance, which is obtained by focusing on the respective best segments. For instance, for the trapezius (TRA) signal, in combination with the electric pain domain, we obtained an averaged accuracy of 68.0%, while the naive approach led to 66.0%. For the thermal pain domain, in combination with the electrodermal activity (EDA) signal, we obtained an averaged accuracy of 59.6%, outperforming the naive approach, which led to 53.2%.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Computer Networks and Communications,Human-Computer Interaction

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3