Comparative Analysis of Starlight Occultation Data Processing
-
Published:2023-12-13
Issue:12
Volume:14
Page:1818
-
ISSN:2073-4433
-
Container-title:Atmosphere
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmosphere
Author:
Sun Mingchen1, Zhu Qinglin1, Dong Xiang1, Xu Bin1, Wang Hong-Guang1, Cheng Xuan2
Affiliation:
1. China Research Institute of Radiowave Propagation, Qingdao 266107, China 2. Deep Space Exploration Laboratory, Beijing 100041, China
Abstract
In order to improve the inversion accuracy of stellar occultation data and to provide a reference for the selection of inversion methods with higher accuracy in the future, this study compared and analyzed the inversion effects of two different methods on the same set of data, which are the effective cross-section method and the onion-peeling method, respectively. Firstly, the inversion principle of the effective cross-section method is introduced in detail. The regularisation parameters and screening conditions for the observation data in the inversion process were clarified based on the ozone observation characteristics. Second, the algorithm was applied to invert the GOMOS observational data from 1 December 2002. The atmospheric radiative transmittance obtained from the observations was filtered, and the inversion results were compared with those obtained using the onion-peeling method. Third, the errors in the height distribution obtained by both methods were calculated using the GOMOS secondary results from 1 December 2002 as the reference value. Finally, the inversion errors of other trace components were computed to further validate the accuracy of the two methods. The results demonstrate that the effective cross-sectional method is more accurate for the inversion of ozone, particularly in low-altitude regions affected by refraction. The method achieved a maximum error of 1.2%, with an apparent magnitude of 2, an effective temperature greater than 10,000 K, and a regularisation parameter of 1015. Furthermore, when applying the same method to the inversion of nitrogen trioxide and calculating the error, it was observed that the results of both methods were comparable at altitude of 30–60 km, with an error value ranging from 0 to 2%. However, at approximately 25 km, the inversion accuracy of the onion-peeling method surpassed that of the effective cross-sectional method. This research provides a theoretical foundation for further investigation of the stellar occultation inversion method and enhancing the accuracy of inversions.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Subject
Atmospheric Science,Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
Reference25 articles.
1. GOMOS on Envisat: An overview;Tamminen;Adv. Space Res.,2004 2. Kyrölä, E., Tamminen, J., Leppelmeier, G.W., Sofieva, V., Hassinen, S., Seppälä, A., Verronen, P.T., Bertaux, J.L., Hauchecorne, A., and Dalaudier, F. (2006). Nighttime ozone profiles in the stratosphere and mesosphere bythe Global Ozone Monitoring by Occultation of Stars on Envisat. J. Geophys. Res., 111. 3. Quémerais, E., Bertaux, J.L., Korablev, O., Dimarellis, E., Cot, C., Sandel, B.R., and Fussen, D. Stellar Occultations observed by SPICAM on Mars Express, J. Geophys. Rev., in press. 4. Lebonnois, S., Quémerais, E., Montmessin, F., Lefèvre, F., Perrier, S., Bertaux, J.L., and Forget, F. Vertical distribution of ozone on Mars as measured by SPICAM/Mars-Express using stellar occultations, J. Geophys. Rev., in press. 5. MAVEN/IUVS stellar occultation measurements of Mars atmospheric structure and composition;Montmessin;J. Geophys. Res. Planets,2018
|
|