Effects and Side Effects in a Short Work Coaching for Participants with and without Mental Illness

Author:

Werk Lilly Paulin1,Muschalla Beate1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychotherapy & Diagnostics, Institute of Psychology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Humboldtstraße 33, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany

Abstract

Employees with mental illness are often the first to be unable to cope with increasingly complex psychosocial work demands. But people without mental illness can also suffer from, for example, high workload. This study compares a short coaching to stabilize work ability for employees with and without mental illness regarding coaching topics, effects on work-related resources, goal attainment, and unwanted events. Individual coaching of three sessions (problem exploration by behavior analysis, practice of new behavior, reflection) was conducted with employees from different professional fields. A medical history was taken to determine whether participants are affected by a mental disorder. All coaching was conducted by the same behavior therapist in training (L.P.W.) under the supervision of an experienced behavior therapist (B.M.). Two hundred and three coachings with three sessions were completed. In total, 103 participants did not have a mental illness (51%), and 100 participants reported a mental disorder (49%). The coaching participants with mental illness had lower initial levels of work-related capacities (more severe impairments) and coping behavior as compared to the participants without mental illness. In the pre–post comparisons, both groups achieved significant improvements in work-related coping after the coaching. There were no differences in goal attainment between both groups. While participants without mental illness reported more unwanted events in parallel to the coaching (30% reported negative developments in life), participants with mental illness reported coaching-related unwanted events (20% felt to be dependent on the coach). Coaching with an individual focus on one topic can improve work-related resources in participants with and without mental disorders. Since participants with and without mental illness experience different unwanted events in coaching, psychotherapeutic expertise is needed in order to set the right focus.

Funder

European Union

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference129 articles.

1. Social and emotional self-efficacy at work;Loeb;Scand. J. Psychol.,2016

2. The importance of work as compared to other forms of daily occupations for wellbeing and functioning among persons with long-term mental illness;Eklund;Community Ment. Health J.,2004

3. Edwards, J.R. (1991). Person-Job Fit: A Conceptual Integration, Literature Review, and Methodological Critique, John Wiley & Sons.

4. The effects of positive affect, person-job fit, and well-being on job performance;Lin;Soc. Behav. Pers.,2014

5. Person-organization fit and person-job fit in employee selection: A review of the literature;Sekiguchi;Osaka Keidai Ronshu,2004

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3