Abstract
Social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) is an emerging and pivotal tool for sustainability evaluation of products throughout their life cycle. Understanding deeply published papers helps to modify methods and identify research gaps. The aim of this study is to discover the existing gap in the S-LCA of products and to find the weaknesses of the approach. The method of performing the review was a narrative review where published papers from 2006 to 2020 were included through the use of the Web of Science and Scopus databases. S-LCA is considered to be relevant to a majority of sectors and processes (agricultural, industrial, technology, energy, and tourism). However, there is not sufficient research on evaluation of S-LCA on cereal crops and livestock output. It is indicated that, in the present S-LCA studies, there has been a lack of attention paid to the society and value chain actors and final consumer stakeholders. The elements of sexual harassment and employment relationships are not considered in SLCA studies. Italy has the largest amount of cases of S-LCA studies. The major challenges of applying S-LCA (by using site specific data) is data collection, which is time-consuming. It is recommended to evaluate a comprehensive sustainability assessment by adding cost of social assessment to LCA since there has been a lack of attention on assessment of cost in S-LCA.
Funder
Universiti Putra Malyasia
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference101 articles.
1. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Futurehttps://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf
2. Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Productshttp://www.unep.fr/shared/publications/pdf/dtix1164xpa-guidelines_slca.pdf
3. Method development for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) of New Norwegian Biorefineryhttps://norsus.no/publikasjon/method-development-for-life-cycle-sustainability-assessment-lcsa-of-new-norwegian-biorefinery/
4. Guidelines for Social Life,2020
5. Towards social life cycle assessment of mobility services: systematic literature review and the way forward
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献