Optimal Synthesis of Loader Drive Mechanisms: A Group Robust Decision-Making Rule Generation Approach

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to present a novel, hybrid group multi-criteria decision approach that can be used to evaluate alternatives for the optimal synthesis of loader drive mechanisms. In most product design engineering groups, experts have expertise in different areas and robust decision-making is necessary to integrate a number of opposing opinions, attitudes, and solutions. This study presents the application of an integrated approach for decision-making, i.e., the generation of a robust decision-making rule for group decision-making (RDMR-G) by combining different multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods and Taguchi’s robust quality engineering principles. The basic idea behind this article was to create an approach that enables the comprehensive and robust consideration of expert opinions given the existence of numerous objective and subjective methods for determining the criteria weights, which are crucial to the final ranking of alternatives in any decision-making problem. In order to set the optimal configuration of a loader drive mechanism, five experts, all with a high level of experience and knowledge in this field, considered twenty-six different kinematic chain construction solutions, i.e., alternatives, and evaluated them with respect to six criteria. The obtained results and rankings provided by each expert and each criteria weighting method were compared using Kendall’s τb and Spearman’s ρ tests. As an example, this paper demonstrates the practical application of a RDMR-G approach and in doing so contributes to the literature in the fields of product design engineering and decision-making.