Increased Dynamic Drivetrain Performance by Implementing a Modular Design with Decentralized Control Architecture
Author:
Divens Niels1ORCID, Tuerlinckx Théo1ORCID, Westerhof Bernhard1, Stockman Kurt23ORCID, van Os David23ORCID, Laurijssen Koen1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. MotionS Core Lab, Flanders Make vzw, 3001 Leuven, Belgium 2. Department of Electromechanical, Systems and Metal Engineering, Ghent University, 9052 Gent, Belgium 3. MIRO Core Lab, Flanders Make vzw, 9052 Gent, Belgium
Abstract
This paper assesses the energy consumption, control performance, and application-specific functional requirements of a modular drivetrain in comparison to a benchmark drivetrain. A decentralised control architecture has been developed and validated using mechanical plant models. Simscape models have been validated with data from an experimental setup including an equivalent modular and benchmark drivetrain. In addition, the control strategy has been implemented and validated on the experimental setup. The results prove the ability of the control strategy to synchronize the motion of the different sliders, resulting in crank position tracking errors below 0.032 radians on the setup. The model and experimental data show an increased performance of the modular drivetrain compared to the benchmark drivetrain in terms of energy consumption, control performance, and functional requirements. The modular drivetrain is especially advantageous for machines running highly dynamic motion profiles due to the reduced inertia. For such motion profiles, an increased position tracking of up to 84% has been measured. In addition, it is shown that the modular drivetrain root mean square (RMS) torque is reduced with 32% compared to the benchmark drivetrain. However, these mechanical energy savings are partly counteracted by the higher motor losses seen in the modular drivetrain, resulting in potential electrical energy savings of around 29%.
Subject
Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Control and Optimization,Mechanical Engineering,Computer Science (miscellaneous),Control and Systems Engineering
Reference29 articles.
1. Vandenhove, T., Diltoer, R., Lenaerts, B., van Os, D., Stockman, K., and Schlimpert, S. (2021, January 7–9). Modular Drivetrains for Increased Performance and Reliability. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics (ICM), Kashiwa, Japan. 2. Lemmens, J., and Driesen, J. (2012, January 27–29). Synchronization and efficiency analysis of a direct-drive multi-motor application. Proceedings of the 6th IET International Conference on Power Electronics, Machines and Drives (PEMD 2012), Bristol, UK. 3. Global Views on Modular Design Research: Linking Alternative Methods to Support Modular Product Family Concept Development;Otto;J. Mech. Des.,2016 4. Schuh, G., Dölle, C., Barg, S., Kuhn, M., and Breunig, S. (2018, January 16–19). Efficient Modular Product Platform Design of Mechatronic Systems. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), Bangkok, Thailand. 5. Xu, Z., Xi, F., Liu, L., and Chen, L. (2017). A Method for Design of Modular Reconfigurable Machine Tools. Machines, 5.
|
|