Mass Flow Function Correlation for Solid and Honeycomb Land Labyrinth Seals including Fin Front Angle, Clearance, Fin Number and Honeycomb Geometry
Author:
Kim Hyeok Je1, Kang Young Jun1, Kim Woojun1ORCID, Jo Ye Rim1, Park Suhyeon1, Kwak Jae Su1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, Korea Aerospace University, 76, Hanggongdaehak-ro, Deogyang-gu, Goyang-si 10540, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
Abstract
In this study, the effects of several geometry factors (fin front angle, clearance, number of fins, and honeycomb cell diameter and depth) on the mass flow function of solid and honeycomb land were studied experimentally. The fin front angle considered in the experiment ranged from 60 to 90 degrees, the number of fins was varied between two and three, and the diameter and depth of the honeycomb cell ranged from 1.33 to 4.00 times and 8.08 to 13.08 times the thickness of the fin tip, respectively. The experimental results showed that the mass flow function decreased as the number of fins increased for the solid land labyrinth seal, and the mass flow function increased as the clearance increased. A fin front angle of 60 degrees was found to have the minimum mass flow function. For the honeycomb land labyrinth seal, the mass flow function decreased as the number of fins increased, and the effect of the cell depth was shown to be insignificant compared to the effect of the cell diameter. The effects of cell diameter and cell depth on the mass flow function depended on the conditions of other variables. In addition, the correlation equations of the mass flow functions of the solid land and honeycomb land labyrinth seals are presented based on the experimental results, which represent the effects of the fin front angle, clearance, pressure ratio, and diameter and depth of the honeycomb cell. The correlation equation for the solid land labyrinth seal had an r2 value of 0.9822, while the correlation equation for honeycomb land had an r2 value of 0.9621.
Funder
Ministry of Education Korea government
Subject
Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Control and Optimization,Mechanical Engineering,Computer Science (miscellaneous),Control and Systems Engineering
Reference26 articles.
1. The 1993 IGTI Scholar Lecture: Loss Mechanisms in Turbomachines;Denton;ASME J. Turbomach.,1993 2. Chupp, R.E., Hendricks, R.C., Lattime, S.B., and Steinetz, B.M. (2006). Sealing in Turbomachinery, NASA Technical Report, NASA/TM-2006-214341, NASA. 3. Rotor-Tip Leakage: Part II—Design Optimization Through Viscous Analysis and Experiment;Wadia;J. Eng. Power,1982 4. Steinetz, B.M., Hendricks, R.C., and Braun, M.J. (2004). Turbomachine Sealing and Secondary Flows, Part 1—Review of Sealing Performance, Customer, Engine Designer, and Research Issues, NASA Technical Report, NASA/TM-2004-211991/Part1, NASA. 5. Determining and improving labyrinth seal performance in current and advanced high performance gas turbines;Stocker;AGARD Seal Technol. Gas Turbine Eng.,1978
|
|