Affiliation:
1. Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA
2. Northrup Grumman Space Systems, 9160 UT-83, Corinne, UT 84307, USA
3. PTC Inc., 121 Seaport Blvd, Boston, MA 02210, USA
Abstract
Manufacturing management and operations place heavy emphasis on monitoring and improving production performance. This supervision is accomplished through strategies of manufacturing performance management, a set of measurements and methods used to monitor production conditions. Over the last 30 years, the most prevalent measurement of traditional performance management has been overall equipment effectiveness, a percentile summary metric of a machine’s utilization. The technologies encapsulated by Industry 4.0 have expanded the ability to gather, process, and store vast quantities of data, creating the opportunity to innovate on how performance is measured. A new method of managing manufacturing performance utilizing Industry 4.0 technologies has been proposed by McKinsey & Company (New York City, NY, USA), and software tools have been developed by PTC Inc. (Boston, MA, USA) to aid in performing what they both call digital performance management. To evaluate this new approach, the digital performance management tool was deployed on a Festo (Esslingen, Germany) Cyber-Physical Lab (FCPL), an educational mock production environment, and compared to a digitally enabled traditional performance management solution. Results from a multi-day production period displayed an increased level of detail in both the data presented to the user and the insights gained from the digital performance management solution as compared to the traditional approach. The time unit measurements presented by digital performance management paint a clear picture of what and where losses are occurring during production and the impact of those losses. This is contrasted by the single summary metric of a traditional performance management approach, which easily obfuscates the constituent data and requires further investigation to determine what and where production losses are occurring.
Funder
Northrup Grumman Corporation
Reference27 articles.
1. A review of performance measurement: Towards performance management;Folan;Comput. Ind.,2005
2. The performance measurement revolution: Why now and what next?;Neely;Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag.,1999
3. Nanni, A.J., and Vollmann, T.E. (1990). The New Performance Challenge: Measuring Operations for World-Class Competition, Dow Jones-Irwin.
4. Nakajima, S. (1988). Introduction to TPM: Total Productive Maintenance, Productivity Press, Inc.
5. Williamson, R.M. (2006). Using Overall Equipment Effectiveness: The Metric and the Measures, Strategic Work System, Inc.