Digital Performance Management: An Evaluation of Manufacturing Performance Management and Measurement Strategies in an Industry 4.0 Context

Author:

Smith Nathaniel David1,Hovanski Yuri1ORCID,Tenny Joe2,Bergner Sebastian3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA

2. Northrup Grumman Space Systems, 9160 UT-83, Corinne, UT 84307, USA

3. PTC Inc., 121 Seaport Blvd, Boston, MA 02210, USA

Abstract

Manufacturing management and operations place heavy emphasis on monitoring and improving production performance. This supervision is accomplished through strategies of manufacturing performance management, a set of measurements and methods used to monitor production conditions. Over the last 30 years, the most prevalent measurement of traditional performance management has been overall equipment effectiveness, a percentile summary metric of a machine’s utilization. The technologies encapsulated by Industry 4.0 have expanded the ability to gather, process, and store vast quantities of data, creating the opportunity to innovate on how performance is measured. A new method of managing manufacturing performance utilizing Industry 4.0 technologies has been proposed by McKinsey & Company (New York City, NY, USA), and software tools have been developed by PTC Inc. (Boston, MA, USA) to aid in performing what they both call digital performance management. To evaluate this new approach, the digital performance management tool was deployed on a Festo (Esslingen, Germany) Cyber-Physical Lab (FCPL), an educational mock production environment, and compared to a digitally enabled traditional performance management solution. Results from a multi-day production period displayed an increased level of detail in both the data presented to the user and the insights gained from the digital performance management solution as compared to the traditional approach. The time unit measurements presented by digital performance management paint a clear picture of what and where losses are occurring during production and the impact of those losses. This is contrasted by the single summary metric of a traditional performance management approach, which easily obfuscates the constituent data and requires further investigation to determine what and where production losses are occurring.

Funder

Northrup Grumman Corporation

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference27 articles.

1. A review of performance measurement: Towards performance management;Folan;Comput. Ind.,2005

2. The performance measurement revolution: Why now and what next?;Neely;Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag.,1999

3. Nanni, A.J., and Vollmann, T.E. (1990). The New Performance Challenge: Measuring Operations for World-Class Competition, Dow Jones-Irwin.

4. Nakajima, S. (1988). Introduction to TPM: Total Productive Maintenance, Productivity Press, Inc.

5. Williamson, R.M. (2006). Using Overall Equipment Effectiveness: The Metric and the Measures, Strategic Work System, Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3