Experimental Validation of a Driver Monitoring System
Author:
Garrosa María1ORCID, Ceccarelli Marco2ORCID, Díaz Vicente1, Russo Matteo2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Mechanical Engineering Department, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Avda. de la Universidad 30, 28911 Leganés, Spain 2. Department of Industrial Engineering, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Via del Politecnico 1, 00133 Rome, Italy
Abstract
This paper presents an analysis of the risk of neck injury in vehicle occupants as a consequence of an impact. A review of the formulation of indexes that are used in the assessment and investigation of neck injury risk is discussed with the aim of providing a new, more appropriate index using suitable sensorized equipment. An experimental analysis is proposed with a new driver monitoring device using low-cost sensors. The system consists of wearable units for the head, neck, and torso where inertial measurement sensors (IMU) are installed to record data concerning the occupant’s head, neck, and torso accelerations while the vehicle moves. Two laser infrared distance sensors are also installed on the vehicle’s steering wheel to record the position data of the head and neck, as well as an additional IMU for vehicle acceleration values. To validate both the device and the new index, experiments are designed in which different sensorized volunteers reproduce an emergency braking maneuver with an instrumented vehicle at speeds of 10, 20, and 30 km/h before the beginning of any braking action. The neck is particularly sensitive to sudden changes in acceleration, so a sudden braking maneuver is enough to constitute a potential risk of cervical spine injury. During the experiments, large accelerations and displacements were recorded as the test speed increased. The largest accelerations were obtained in the experimental test at a speed of 30 km/h with values of 19.17, 9.57, 9.28, and 5.09 m/s2 in the head, torso, neck, and vehicle, respectively. In the same experiment, the largest displacement of the head was 0.33 m and that of the neck was 0.27 m. Experimental results have verified that the designed device can be effectively used to characterize the biomechanical response of the neck in car impacts. The new index is also able to quantify a neck injury risk by taking into account the dynamics of a vehicle and the kinematics of the occupant’s head, neck, and torso. The numerical value of the new index is inversely proportional to the acceleration experienced by the vehicle occupant, so that small values indicate risky conditions.
Subject
Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Control and Optimization,Mechanical Engineering,Computer Science (miscellaneous),Control and Systems Engineering
Reference42 articles.
1. Estimating the number of traffic crash-related cervical spine injuries in the United States; An analysis and comparison of national crash and hospital data;Freeman;Accid. Anal. Prev.,2020 2. A review of neck injury and protection in vehicle accidents;Li;Transp. Saf. Environ.,2019 3. Whiplash Injuries;Teasell;Curr. Treat. Options Rheumatol.,2020 4. Reducing the global burden of musculoskeletal conditions;Briggs;Bull. World Health Organ.,2018 5. Boström, O., Svensson, M.Y., Aldman, B., Hansson, H.A., Håland, Y., Lövsund, P., and Örtengren, T. (1996, January 11–13). A new neck injury criterion candidate-based on injury findings in the cervical spinal ganglia after experimental neck extension trauma. Proceedings of the International Ircobi Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact, Dublin, Ireland.
|
|