Affiliation:
1. Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí 78290, Mexico
2. División de Ingenierías Campus Irapuato Salamanca (DICIS), Universidad de Guanajuato, Guanajuato 36885, Mexico
3. Tecnologico de Monterrey, Campus Querétaro, Querétaro 76130, Mexico
Abstract
Anthropometric measurements are essential in various fields, such as sports, the automotive industry, clothing, health care, biomechanics, ergonomics, and gait analysis. However, the data collection process for these measurements is costly and time-consuming, and the data collected are not always precise and accurate. In this paper, some of the most widely reported machine vision systems (MVSs) are evaluated to determine the anthropometric length of body segments (BSs) used in gait analysis. The aim is to evaluate the performance of the MVSs and identify the most appropriate vision approach, in terms of accuracy, cost, speed, and computing performance. For this purpose, five BSs of the lower limb were selected and measured using both the MVS and the conventional manual anthropometric measurement (MAM) techniques. The results show that the MVSs represent an excellent alternative to measure the anthropometric parameters corresponding to the BSs, with some advantages in terms of sampling process time, precision, and equipment requirements.
Subject
Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Control and Optimization,Mechanical Engineering,Computer Science (miscellaneous),Control and Systems Engineering
Reference28 articles.
1. The Future of Industrial Communication: Automation Networks in the Era of the Internet of Things and Industry 4.0;Wollschlaeger;IEEE Ind. Electron. Mag.,2017
2. Marshall, R., and Summerskill, S. (2019). DHM and Posturography, Academic Press.
3. Age and body mass index associations with body segment parameters;Merrill;J. Biomech.,2019
4. Predictive regression modeling of body segment parameters using individual-based anthropometric measurements;Merrill;J. Biomech.,2019
5. Chaffin, D.B., Andersson, G.B.J., and Martin, B.J. (2006). Occupational Biomechanics, Wiley-Interscience.