Between-Sex Differences in Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease among Patients with Myocardial Infarction—A Systematic Review

Author:

Barton Jack Charles1,Wozniak Anna1ORCID,Scott Chloe1,Chatterjee Abhisekh2ORCID,Titterton Greg Nathan3ORCID,Corrigan Amber Elyse4,Kuri Ashvin3,Shah Viraj2ORCID,Soh Ian5,Kaski Juan Carlos6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine Research Group, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK

2. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK

3. Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK

4. Department of Medicine, Kings College London, London SE5 9RS, UK

5. St. George’s University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK

6. Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St. George’s University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK

Abstract

Between-sex differences in the presentation, risk factors, management, and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction (MI) are well documented. However, as such differences are highly sensitive to cultural and social changes, there is a need to continuously re-evaluate the evidence. The present contemporary systematic review assesses the baseline characteristics of men and women presenting to secondary, tertiary, and quaternary centres with acute myocardial infarction (MI). Over 1.4 million participants from 18 studies, including primary prospective, cross sectional and retrospective observational studies, as well as secondary analysis of registry data are included in the study. The study showed that women were more likely than men to have a previous diagnosis of diabetes, hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, and heart failure. They also had lower odds of presenting with previous ischaemic heart disease and angina, dyslipidaemia, or a smoking history. Further work is necessary to understand the reasons for these differences, and the role that gender-specific risk factors may have in this context. Moreover, how these between-gender differences are implicated in management and outcomes also requires further work.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

Reference63 articles.

1. Studying both sexes: A guiding principle for biomedicine;Clayton;FASEB J. Off. Publ. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol.,2015

2. Sex bias in neuroscience and biomedical research;Beery;Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.,2011

3. Heinrich, J., Gahart, M.T., Rowe, E.J., and Bradley, L. (2023, April 17). Drug Safety: Most Drugs Withdrawn in Recent Years Had Greater Health. Risks for Women, Available online: https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-01-286r.

4. Relative contribution of trends in myocardial infarction event rates and case fatality to declines in mortality: An international comparative study of 1·95 million events in 80·4 million people in four countries;Camacho;Lancet Public Heal,2022

5. Acute Myocardial Infarction in Women: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association;Mehta;Circulation,2016

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3