An Exploratory Study Investigating Factors Influencing the Outpatient Delivery of Geriatric Rehabilitation
-
Published:2023-07-31
Issue:15
Volume:12
Page:5045
-
ISSN:2077-0383
-
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Medicine
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JCM
Author:
Prins Lidy A. P.1, Gamble Chris J.12, van Dam van Isselt Eléonore F.3ORCID, Stammen Romy A. I.4, Ettaibi Ahlam4, Creemers Ilse A. M.4, van Haastregt Jolanda C. M.1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands 2. Stichting Valkenhof, 5555 KL Valkenswaard, The Netherlands 3. Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands 4. Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
Abstract
Background: Outpatient delivery of geriatric rehabilitation (GR) might contribute to preserving the accessibility and quality of GR, whilst dealing with an increasing demand for healthcare in an aging population. However, the application of outpatient GR differs between GR facilities. This study aimed to gain insight into factors influencing outpatient GR utilization. Methods: In this case study, 24 semi-structured interviews were conducted with physicians, physiotherapists, nurse practitioners, occupational therapists, and managers in GR. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using summative content analysis. Results: Various patient-related barriers for using outpatient GR were mentioned including lacking social support and limited capacities and self-management skills. Additionally, professional-related barriers included a lack of awareness and consensus among care professionals regarding the possibilities and potential advantages of outpatient GR. Yet, most perceived barriers were related to efficiency and organization of outpatient GR (e.g., reimbursement system, lacking practical guidance). Still, most participants were in favor of increasing outpatient GR because of expected advantages for patients, GR organizations, and society. Conclusions: Despite experienced barriers, there seems to be agreement on the need to increase outpatient GR application. It is recommended to use the present findings to develop and evaluate new ways of organizing and reimbursing outpatient GR.
Reference41 articles.
1. Kotsani, M., Kravvariti, E., Avgerinou, C., Panagiotakis, S., Bograkou Tzanetakou, K., Antoniadou, E., Karamanof, G., Karampeazis, A., Koutsouri, A., and Panagiotopoulou, K. (2021). The Relevance and Added Value of Geriatric Medicine (GM): Introducing GM to Non-Geriatricians. J. Clin. Med., 10. 2. European Consensus on Core Principles and Future Priorities for Geriatric Rehabilitation: Consensus Statement;Grund;Eur. Geriatr. Med.,2020 3. van Iersel, M.B., Smalbrugge, M., van de Pol, M., Petrovic, M., de Rooij, S., and Rikkert, M.G.M.O. (2017). Leerboek Geriatrie, De Tijdstroom. 4. Team Models in Neurorehabilitation: Structure, Function, and Culture Change;Karol;NeuroRehabilitation,2014 5. Understanding and Improving Multidisciplinary Team Working in Geriatric Medicine;Ellis;Age Ageing,2019
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|