Joint Failure Probability of Dams Based on Probabilistic Flood Hazard Analysis

Author:

Montgomery Matthew G.1ORCID,Yaw Miles B.1,Schwartz John S.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Tennessee Valley Authority, Knoxville, TN 37902, USA

2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tickle College of Engineering, University of Tennessee Knoxville, Knoxville, TN 37916, USA

Abstract

Probabilistic risk methods are becoming increasingly accepted as a means of carrying out risk-informed decision making regarding the design and operation policy of structures such as dams. Probabilistic risk calculations require the quantification of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties not investigated through deterministic methodologies. In this hydrological study, a stochastic sampling methodology is employed to investigate the joint failure probability of three dams in adjacent similarly sized watersheds within the same hydrologic unit code (HUC) 6 basin. A probabilistic flood hazard analysis (PFHA) framework is used to simulate the hydrologic loading of a range of extreme precipitation events across the combined watershed area of the three studied dams. Precipitation events are characterized by three distinct storm types influential in the Tennessee Valley region with implications for weather variability and climate change. The stochastic framework allows for the simulation of hundreds of thousands of spillway outflows that are used to produce empirical bivariate exceedance probabilities for spillway discharge pairs at selected dams. System response curves that indicate the probability of failure given spillway discharge are referenced for each dam and applied to generate empirical bivariate failure probability (joint failure probability) estimates. The stochastic simulation results indicate the range of spillway discharges for each pair of dams that pose the greatest risk of joint failure. The estimate of joint failure considering the dependence of spillway discharges between dams is shown to be three to four orders of magnitude more likely (7.42 × 102 to 5.68 × 103) than estimates that assume coincident failures are the result of independent hydrologic events.

Funder

Tennessee River Authority

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference53 articles.

1. Smith, C.H., Bartles, M., and Fleming, M. (2018). Hydrologic Hazard Methodology for Semi-Quantitative Risk Assessments: An Inflow Volume-Based Approach to Estimating Stage-Frequency for Dams, USACE RMC-TR-2018-03.

2. Fleming, M.J., and Duren, A. (2015, January 17–21). Stochastic Hydrologic Simulation for Extension of Reservoir Pool Stage Frequency Curves. Proceedings of the World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, Austin, TX, USA.

3. England, J.F., Cohn, T.A., Faber, B.A., Stedinger, J.R., Thomas, W.O., Veilleux, A.G., Kiang, J.E., and Mason, R.R. (2022, October 01). Guidelines for Determining Flood Flow Frequency—Bulletin 17C. U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, 2018, Book 4, Chap. B5, 148, Available online: https://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/04/b05/tm4b5.pdf.

4. Identifying sensitivities in flood frequency analyses using a stochastic hydrologic modeling system;Newman;Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.,2021

5. Bivariate Flood Frequency Analysis Using the Copula Method;Zhang;J. Hydrol. Engr.,2006

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3