Abstract
This paper explores how current challenges in the development-led system of archaeology in the UK are widely applicable elsewhere. Using the UK model, we explore the legislative and structural frameworks that enable archaeological work and the pressing need to better provide benefit for the wider public from that work. We believe that there is a focus on outputs rather than outcomes, which has perpetuated the idea that contracting archaeology is a product of development rather than a process that can instigate social value. We argue that the shift to public benefit and social value in UK policy should be encouraging practitioners operating within this industry to pay more attention to the links between their standard contracting practice and the benefits they deliver to people through their work. We explore why this could be a way of meeting policy priorities but also an opportunity to bridge the gaps between expert-identified heritage values and societal needs.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference50 articles.
1. Is archaeology conceivable within the degrowth movement?
2. Have We Reached Peak Archaeologists? (in the United Kingdom) Landward Research Occasional Papers 001;Rocks-Macqueen,2018
3. Whither archaeologists? Continuing challenges to field practice
4. Comparison of the Planning Systems in the Four UK Countries: National Assembly of Wales Research Reporthttps://senedd.wales/Research%20Documents/16-001%20-%20Comparison%20of%20the%20planning%20systems%20in%20the%20four%20UK%20countries/16-001.pdf
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献