Animal Behaviour Packs a Punch: From Parasitism to Production, Pollution and Prevention in Grazing Livestock
Author:
Smith Lesley A.1, Fox Naomi J.1, Marion Glenn2ORCID, Booth Naomi J.1, Morris Alex M. M.1ORCID, Athanasiadou Spiridoula1ORCID, Hutchings Michael R.1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Scotland’s Rural College (SRUC), West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK 2. Biomathematics and Statistics Scotland (BioSS), Kings Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3FD, UK
Abstract
Behaviour is often the fundamental driver of disease transmission, where behaviours of individuals can be seen to scale up to epidemiological patterns seen at the population level. Here we focus on animal behaviour, and its role in parasite transmission to track its knock-on consequences for parasitism, production and pollution. Livestock face a nutrition versus parasitism trade-off in grazing environments where faeces creates both a nutritional benefit, fertilizing the surrounding sward, but also a parasite risk from infective nematode larvae contaminating the sward. The grazing decisions of ruminants depend on the perceived costs and benefits of the trade-off, which depend on the variations in both environmental (e.g., amounts of faeces) and animal factors (e.g., physiological state). Such grazing decisions determine the intake of both nutrients and parasites, affecting livestock growth rates and production efficiency. This impacts on the greenhouse gas costs of ruminant livestock production via two main mechanisms: (1) slower growth results in longer durations on-farm and (2) parasitised animals produce more methane per unit food intake. However, the sensitivity of behaviour to host parasite state offers opportunities for early detection of parasitism and control. Remote monitoring technology such as accelerometers can detect parasite-induced sickness behaviours soon after exposure, before impacts on growth, and thus may be used for targeting individuals for early treatment. We conclude that livestock host x parasite interactions are at the centre of the global challenges of food security and climate change, and that understanding livestock behaviour can contribute to solving both.
Reference79 articles.
1. Mohammadi, Z., Cojocaru, M.G., and Thommes, E.W. (2022). Human Behaviour, NPI and Mobility Reduction Effects on COVID-19 Transmission in Different Countries of the World. BMC Public Health, 22. 2. The Effect of Three Levels of Intake of Ostertagia Circumcincta Larvae on Growth Rate, Food Intake and Body Composition of Growing Lambs;Coop;J. Agric. Sci.,1982 3. Hoque, M., Mondal, S., and Adusumilli, S. (2022). Sustainable Livestock Production and Food Security. Emerging Issues in Climate Smart Livestock Production, Academic Press. 4. Min, B.R., Lee, S., Jung, H., Miller, D.N., and Chen, R. (2022). Enteric Methane Emissions and Animal Performance in Dairy and Beef Cattle Production: Strategies, Opportunities, and Impact of Reducing Emissions. Animals, 12. 5. FAO (2017). The Future of Food and Agriculture—Trends and Challenges, FAO.
|
|