Affiliation:
1. Departamento de Ciencias Veterinarias y Agrarias, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de la República, Paysandú 60000, Uruguay
2. Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
3. Departamento de Producción Animal y Pasturas, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Paysandú 60000, Uruguay
Abstract
Eighty-four autumn (ACS, n = 45)- and spring (SCS, n = 39)-calved multiparous early lactation Holstein cows were assigned to groups of either: (a) grazing + mixed ration (MR) during partial confinement in outdoor soil-bedded pens with shade (OD-GRZ); (b) grazing + MR during partial confinement in a compost-bedded pack barn with cooling (CB-GRZ); or (c) total confinement fed a totally mixed ration (CB-TMR) in a compost-bedded pack barn. Data were analyzed using the SAS MIXED procedure with significance at p ≤ 0.05. In both seasons, despite behavioral differences (p < 0.05) between the OD-GRZ and CB-GRZ groups (i.e., standing, first grazing meal length, bite rate), the milk and component yields, DM intake, microbial CP output (MCP) and NE efficiency were unaffected by the housing conditions, possibly due to mild weather conditions. The milk yield was substantially higher in the CB-TMR group versus the OD-TMR and CB-TMR groups (p < 0.01) in both ACS (~35%) and SCS (~20%) despite there being no intake differences, without any impact on milk component levels. In ACS, this was associated with a higher MCP, likely due to the higher nutritional value of TMR compared to pasture, which was not the case in SCS. In conclusion, the OD-GRZ group achieved the same milk production as the CB-GRZ group through behavior adaptation, under mild weather conditions, in both calving seasons. The CB-TMR group outperformed the grazing systems in both calving seasons, regardless of the MCP.
Funder
Red Tecnológica Sectorial
Reference64 articles.
1. Opportunities and challenges for the growth of milk production from pasture: The case of farm systems in Uruguay;Chilibroste;Agric. Syst.,2019
2. Ortega, G., Berberian, N., and Chilibroste, P. (2024). The effects of stocking rate, residual sward height, and forage supplementation on forage production, feeding strategies, and productivity of milking dairy cows. Front. Anim. Sci., 5.
3. Aguerre, M., Méndez, M.N., and Torterolo, S. (2018, January 19–21). Chilibroste, Dimensionamiento y Característica de la Infraestructura en Sistemas Lecheros Comerciales 1: Animales en Lactancia. Proceedings of the Asociación Uruguaya de Producción Animal, Tacuarembó, Uruguay. Available online: https://www.aupa.org.uy/congreso-2018.
4. Review: Advantages and limitations of dairy efficiency measures and the effects of nutrition and feeding management interventions;Tricarico;Prof. Anim. Sci.,2017
5. Two- or Four-Hour Lying Deprivation on the Behavior of Lactating Dairy Cows;Cooper;J. Dairy Sci.,2007