Affiliation:
1. State Key Laboratory of Water Environment Simulation, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
2. Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China
Abstract
Forests are essential for the provision of water, financial resources, food, and carbon, and offer immense ecosystem service values. The accurate, quantitative, and objective evaluation of forest ecosystem service (FES) values can help uncover methods for realizing ecological product value, which in turn supports forest conservation and ecological benefit enhancement. In China, FES valuation methods are diverse and tailored to specific objectives, encompassing matter quantity assessment, value quantity assessment, energy value analysis, and landscape ecological modeling methods. The “Forest Ecosystem Service Function Assessment Specification” guideline plays a crucial role in fostering standardized valuation. Carbon-related ecosystem services have been increasingly studied in China; however, valuation challenges remain, including data accuracy, the double counting of ecosystem services, methodological limitations, and the incomplete assessment of non-use values. Regarding value realization, the development of payment for ecosystem services (PES), ecological product benefit trading (EPBT), ecological premiums, and ecological industries has seen gradual progresses in recent years. However, realization approaches still depend on government support, and the establishment of market-oriented strategies requires further reinforcement. Enhancing FES valuation necessitates the integration of interdisciplinary and multi-method approaches, as well as the creation of an accounting and assessment mechanism. Realization approaches must not only be continuously expanded but also consistently innovated over time. It is essential to consider the impact of market development on FES valuation; establish robust realization approaches; reinforce promotional and guarantee mechanisms; and increase the efficacy of policy management.
Funder
National Key Research and Development Project
National Natural Sciences Fund Project
Subject
Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Global and Planetary Change
Reference77 articles.
1. Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems;Dixon;Science,1994
2. Daily, G.C. (1997). Nature Services: Social Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, Island Press.
3. Forest ecosystem service assessment and path design of value-oriented realization in China;Wang;Environ. Prot.,2020
4. Literature review and comments on forest ecological compensation;Liu;J. Nanjing For. Univ.,2019
5. A primary study on Chinese terrestrial ecosystem services and their ecological economic values;Ouyang;Acta Ecol. Sin.,1999
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献