Academic Pursuits and Involvement in Decision-Making: Study on the Formation of U.S. University Think Tanks

Author:

Lyu Qing123ORCID,Bielefield Arlene4,Liu Yan Quan4

Affiliation:

1. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101408, China

2. Institute for the History of Natural Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

3. National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

4. Department of Information and Library Science, Southern Connecticut State University, New Haven, CT 06515, USA

Abstract

This paper analyzes the concept of think tanks and concludes that think tanks have three basic characteristics. Firstly, they are based on academic research, relatively independent operation, and aim to serve scientific decision-making. Taking Ivy League think tanks as an example, this paper provides a preliminary discussion of ways for think tanks to maintain the scientific nature of their research, maintain the independence of their operations, and disseminate research results to enhance their influence. It covers institutional mission, research team construction, institutional governance, fundraising, achievements and activities, and alumni networks. This paper proposes a framework of university think tank generation paths associated with the essential characteristics of think tanks. The paper points out that, as a research consulting organization grown out of universities, university think tanks must maintain the scientific nature and independence of research while providing support and services for decision-making. Only in this way can they truly serve scientific and democratic decision-making, gain the trust of the public and have a real lasting influence.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference35 articles.

1. Aditi Kumar (2020, April 24). “Q&A: Aditi Kumar” Fall/Winter 2019–2020. Available online: https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/qa-aditi-kumar/.

2. CASS (2023, March 15). The AMI Research Report on Comprehensive Evaluation of Chinese Think Tanks. Available online: http://zqb.cyol.com/html/2017-11/20/nw.D110000zgqnb_20171120_3-02.htm.

3. CCTTSE (2023, March 15). CTTI Source Think Tank MRPA Evaluation Report. Available online: https://cttrec.nju.edu.cn/DFS//file/2019/09/12/201909121053006671ib5ha.pdf.

4. Chance, Alek (2020, April 29). Think Tanks in the United States: Activities, Agendas, and Influence. ICAS Reports 2016. Available online: https://onthinktanks.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/ICAS-Report-2016-Think-Tanks-in-the-US-2.pdf.

5. Chu, Ming (2013). Comparative Study of US and European Think Tanks, China Social Science Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3