Abstract
The present study was designed to compare the stress distributions in two restoration types of implants and the surrounding bone. The first restoration type was a conventional cement-retained zirconia crown, and the second was a novel cementless screw-retained zirconia crown with a base abutment. A three-dimensional finite element method was used to model the implants, restorations, and supporting bone. A comparative study of the two implants was performed under two masticatory loads: a vertical load of 100 N and a 30-degree oblique load of 100 N. Under both loading conditions, the maximum von Mises stress and strain values in the implant and supporting bone were higher in the conventional cement-retained restoration model than in the cementless screw-retained model. In terms of stress distribution, the cementless screw-retained zirconia crown with base abutment may be considered a superior restoration option compared to the conventional cement-retained zirconia crown.
Subject
General Materials Science
Reference28 articles.
1. Biological Responses to the Transitional Area of Dental Implants: Material- and Structure-Dependent Responses of Peri-Implant Tissue to Abutments
2. The influence of thread geometry on biomechanical load transfer to bone: A finite element analysis comparing two implant thread designs;Herekar;J. Dent. Res.,2014
3. Influence of Connections and Surfaces of Dental Implants on Marginal Bone Loss: A Retrospective Study Over 7 to 19 Years
4. Long-term outcome of cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported partial restorations;Nissan;Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant.,2011
5. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: A critical review;Michalakis;Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant.,2003
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献