Positional Accuracy Assessment of Digital Elevation Models and 3D Vector Datasets Using Check-Surfaces

Author:

Mozas-Calvache Antonio Tomás1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cartographic, Geodetic and Photogrammetric Engineering, University of Jaen, 23071 Jaen, Spain

Abstract

This study focuses on the positional accuracy of Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) and 3D vector features by considering that both datasets can be used as a product to assess or as a reference. The main objective is to provide an alternative method to the traditional use of checkpoints by using check-surfaces in order to avoid identification issues. The methodology includes the determination of a set of polygons with a significant height in relation to the surrounding area (elevated or depressed) and those cells extracted from the DEM that match these elements. The check-surfaces are obtained after a triangulation of these polygons. The methodology uses procedures based on buffers to provide several results in the form of distribution functions of accuracies (2D, vertical and 3D). The trial has been carried out using a large set of data representing buildings obtained from official institutions. The results show consistent 2D, vertical and 3D accuracy values related to commonly used confidence levels. The application has demonstrated the viability of this approach for obtaining horizontal and vertical accuracies individually and jointly at any confidence level. In addition, the study includes the analysis of the results of specific zones, considering several characteristics.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Computers in Earth Sciences,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference49 articles.

1. (2013). Geographic Information–Quality Principles (Standard No. ISO 19157:2013).

2. (2014). Geographic Information–Reference Model–Part 1: Fundamentals (Standard No. ISO 19101-1:2014).

3. Höhle, J., and Potuckova, M. (2011). Assessment of the Quality of Digital Terrain Models, European Spatial Data Research.

4. U.S. Bureau of the Budget (1947). United States National Map Accuracy Standards.

5. American Society of Civil Engineers (1983). Map Uses, Scales and Accuracies for Engineering and Associated Purposes, American Society of Civil Engineers, Committee on Cartographic Surveying, Surveying and Mapping Division.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3