Affiliation:
1. Department of Economics, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
Abstract
Social farming in Italy has not developed homogeneously. In view of this, this article adopts a multivariate analysis approach to analyse the heterogeneity and the similarities in the development paths of social farming in Italian municipalities. The article takes into account the information from a representative sample of 410 interviews. The results suggest that the offer of social farming activities is highly correlated with the distinct nature of the enterprises and with the interest of local actors, who in many cases finance these activities. Regarding the characteristics of social farms, the results of principal component analysis show that the consolidated experience of offering social services and the continuation of activities are the most important organisational elements. Concerning the territorial distribution, the findings of a hierarchical cluster analysis show that Italian municipalities have distinct experiences according to the level of maturity of the social farms in each cluster, with differences in location, the agricultural system, the organisational culture and the social services provided. Assessing enterprise characteristics and recent development paths for social services in Italy can have far-reaching implications for policy. The latter should provide information and training to farmers and users to increase understanding of the social value of social farming and foster a collaborative and sustainable approach to social farming practice.
Reference53 articles.
1. Social farming as an innovative approach to promote mental health, social inclusion and community engagement;Borgi;Ann. Dell’istituto Super. Di Sanità,2020
2. García-Llorente, M., Rubio-Olivar, R., and Gutierrez-Briceño, I. (2018). Farming for Life Quality and Sustainability: A Literature Review of Green Care Research Trends in Europe. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 15.
3. Transition management and social innovation in rural areas: Lessons from social farming;Moruzzo;J. Agric. Educ. Ext.,2014
4. Genova, A., Maccaroni, M., and Viganò, E. (2020). Social farming: Heterogeneity in social and agricultural relationships. Sustainability, 12.
5. Care Farming in the UK: Contexts, benefits and links with therapeutic communities;Hine;Ther. Communities,2008