Affiliation:
1. Department of Mechanical & Production Engineering, Aarhus University, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
2. Motor Department, Advanced Manufacturing Engineering, Grundfos, 8850 Bjerringbro, Denmark
Abstract
With growing environmental concerns and regulatory requirements, manufacturers are increasingly required to monitor and reduce the environmental impacts of their production processes. Despite increasing digitalization and data-collection capabilities, manufacturers are challenged in collecting the right data and framing process improvement targets. To address this challenge, this paper presents a bottom-up methodology based on the life cycle assessment for identifying performance indicators with the goal of monitoring and reducing the overall environmental impacts of a manufacturing process. More specifically, process performance indicators are defined as a set of controllable process parameters, and their suitability for sustainability monitoring is evaluated based on their sensitivity, measurability, actionability, reliability, timeliness, and human-centricity with respect to a chosen environmental impact category. The bottom-up formulation of process performance indicators is demonstrated through a real-world case study on an infeed centerless grinding process in a large manufacturing company. Results from the case study show that the process performance indicators with regards to climate change impacts included (i) reduction in grinding time, (ii) reduction in total grinding power, (iii) reduction in sparkout time, and (iv) increase in batch size.
Funder
Grundfos Advanced Manufacturing Engineering division
Reference43 articles.
1. International Energy Agency (2023, September 17). Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/co2-emissions-in-2022.
2. (2006). Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Principles and Framework (Standard No. ISO 14040:2006). Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/37456.html.
3. A decision-guidance framework for sustainability performance analysis of manufacturing processes;Kim;Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol.,2015
4. How to treat uncertainties in life cycle assessment studies?;Igos;Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.,2019
5. A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment: Part 2: Impact assessment and interpretation;Reap;Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.,2008