“County-to-City Upgrading” Policy and Firm Innovation—Evidence from China

Author:

Song Yida1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. China Institute of WTO Studies, Academy of China Open Economy Studies, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China

Abstract

The “County-to-City Upgrading” policy represents a typical tool for central and local governments to promote the urbanization process through administrative empowerment. Do local governments’ policies promote innovation-driven high-quality and sustainable development? Under the context of the high-quality development of China’s economy, this paper examines the quantitative impact of the local governments’ “County-to-City Upgrading” policy on enterprises’ innovation. Using a staggered-DID model and the data from the Chinese Patent Database and the Industrial Enterprise Database from 2000 to 2013, the baseline results indicate that the policy not only increases the quantity of innovation but also improves the quality of innovation. The key findings of the research are the following: (1) The policy primarily promotes innovation activities among local enterprises through the cost reduction effect and resource accumulation effect. (2) The policy has a more significant impact on boosting innovation in the eastern regions as well as areas with stronger intellectual property protection. (3) The policy not only can advance technological and practical innovation but can also help enterprises overcome the problem of technological containment. (4) The policy has a prominent impact on green and low-carbon patents, which implies that it has become a significant drive pushing forward local green and sustainable development.

Funder

University of International Business and Economics

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference27 articles.

1. (2023, September 24). World Development Indicators Page. Available online: https://databank.worldbank.org/reports.aspx?source=World-Development-Indicators.

2. Federalism as a Commitment to Preserving Market Incentives;Qian;J. Econ. Perspect.,1997

3. Federalism with and without Political Centralization: China versus Russia;Blanchard;IMF Staff Pap.,2001

4. Challenges of Creating Cities in China: Lessons from A Short-lived “County-to-City Upgrading” Policy;Fan;J. Comp. Econ.,2012

5. Government Interventions and Productivity Growth in Korean Manufacturing Industries;Lee;J. Econ. Growth,1996

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3