Natural and Sustainable? Consumers’ Textile Fiber Preferences

Author:

Sigaard Anna Schytte1ORCID,Laitala Kirsi1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Consumption Research Norway (SIFO), Oslo Metropolitan University, 0170 Oslo, Norway

Abstract

Textile fibers have become a major issue in the debate on sustainable fashion and clothing consumption. While consumers are encouraged to choose more sustainable and circular textile materials, studies have indicated that a reduction in production and consumption has the greatest potential to reduce the total environmental impact. This can be considered an ecocentric perspective with a focus on degrowth as opposed to a technocentric view where new technologies are expected to solve environmental problems while economic growth continues. Based on a survey in Norway (N = 1284), we investigate how the techno- and ecocentric perspectives impact Norwegian consumers’ fiber preferences and perceptions and the corresponding effects on their clothing consumption. We found that the majority of consumers preferred natural fibers compared to synthetic materials. This contradicts current market practices and the recommendations by material sustainability comparison tools such as the Higg Material Sustainability Index (MSI), where many synthetics receive better ratings than natural fibers. We also found that perceptions of high sustainability regarding fibers were negatively correlated with reduced consumption. Our study suggests that a continued focus on material substitution and other technological measures for reducing climate change will impede the move toward sustainability in the textile sector.

Funder

Research Council of Norway and Norwegian Retailers’ Environment Fund

SIFO for conducting the survey

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Mechanics of Materials,Biomaterials,Civil and Structural Engineering,Ceramics and Composites

Reference92 articles.

1. The environmental price of fast fashion;Peters;Nat. Rev. Earth Environ.,2020

2. de Bogotá, C.D.C. (2022). The State of Fashion 2022, BOF and McKinsey Company.

3. Changing Markets Foundation (2021). Fossil Fashion: The Hidden Reliance on Fossil Fuels, Changing Markets Foundation.

4. Microfibres from apparel and home textiles: Prospects for including microplastics in environmental sustainability assessment;Henry;Sci. Total Environ.,2019

5. Quantis (2018). Measuring Fashion. Environmental Impact of the Global Apparel and Footwear Industries Study, Quantis.

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3