Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Implanted Photodynamic Active Biomaterials for Periodontal Bone Regeneration in an Animal Study
-
Published:2023-03-24
Issue:7
Volume:24
Page:6200
-
ISSN:1422-0067
-
Container-title:International Journal of Molecular Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:IJMS
Author:
Sigusch Bernd1, Kranz Stefan1ORCID, von Hohenberg Andreas Clemm1, Wehle Sabine1, Guellmar André1, Steen Dorika2, Berg Albrecht3, Rabe Ute1, Heyder Markus1, Reise Markus1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospitals Jena, An der alten Post 4, 07743 Jena, Germany 2. Biolitec Research GmbH, 07745 Jena, Germany 3. Innovent Technologieentwicklung e.V., 07745 Jena, Germany
Abstract
Recently, our group developed two different polymeric biomaterials with photodynamic antimicrobial surface activity for periodontal bone regeneration. The aim of the present study was to analyze the biocompatibility and osseointegration of these materials in vivo. Two biomaterials based on urethane dimethacrylate (BioM1) and tri-armed oligoester-urethane methacrylate (BioM2) that additionally contained ß-tricalcium phosphate and the photosensitizer mTHPC (meso-tetra(hydroxyphenyl)chlorin) were implanted in non-critical size bone defects in the femur (n = 16) and tibia (n = 8) of eight female domestic sheep. Bone specimens were harvested and histomorphometrically analyzed after 12 months. BioM1 degraded to a lower extent which resulted in a mean remnant square size of 17.4 mm², while 12.2 mm² was estimated for BioM2 (p = 0.007). For BioM1, a total percentage of new formed bone by 30.3% was found which was significant higher compared to BioM2 (8.4%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, BioM1 was afflicted by significant lower soft tissue formation (3.3%) as compared to BioM2 (29.5%). Additionally, a bone-to-biomaterial ratio of 81.9% was detected for BioM1, while 8.5% was recorded for BioM2. Implantation of BioM2 caused accumulation of inflammatory cells and led to fibrous encapsulation. BioM1 (photosensitizer-armed urethane dimethacrylate) showed favorable regenerative characteristics and can be recommended for further studies.
Subject
Inorganic Chemistry,Organic Chemistry,Physical and Theoretical Chemistry,Computer Science Applications,Spectroscopy,Molecular Biology,General Medicine,Catalysis
Reference69 articles.
1. Current Concepts in the Management of Periodontitis;Kwon;Int. Dent. J.,2021 2. Di Stefano, M., Polizzi, A., Santonocito, S., Romano, A., Lombardi, T., and Isola, G. (2022). Impact of Oral Microbiome in Periodontal Health and Periodontitis: A Critical Review on Prevention and Treatment. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 23. 3. Plachokova, A., Andreu-Sánchez, S., Noz, M., Fu, J., and Riksen, N. (2021). Oral Microbiome in Relation to Periodontitis Severity and Systemic Inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 22. 4. Diagnosis and epidemiology of periodontal osseous lesions;Papapanou;Periodontology 2000,2000 5. Biomaterials for promoting periodontal regeneration in human intrabony defects: A systematic review;Stavropoulos;Periodontology,2000
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|